Live data from Hacker News

Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler

nytimes.com

591–600 of 1001 posts

Re: Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler

#591

What happened to Silicon Valley? Just a few years ago, something like this would have triggered libertarian-leaning outrage, especially on HN. Remember the vigorous defenses on here of Backpage? Suddenly everyone’s clutching their pearls and cheering bans that are increasingly broad and unfocused.

Trump is bad for business

Re: Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler

#592

The lesson for today: Anything that you entrust to somebody else is no longer yours. When a social medium or a cloud service shows that it is more powerful than the sitting President of the US, something is seriously wrong. Forget Putin. Trump, Biden, and all of Congress are Bezos and Zuckerberg's bitches.

>When a social medium or a cloud service shows that it is more powerful than the sitting President of the US, something is seriously wrong.

This line of thinking in the time we're living through is so, so weird to me.

Do people not want to live in a nation that unites to isolate powerful individuals creating chaos in the country, up to and including the president? The idea that the president would (should?) somehow be immune to this is as "un-American" as it gets.

That said, you're right on. If you're intent on building and organizing, don't do it on the private surveillance platforms.

Re: Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler

#593

Before this gets too far I’d just like to point out that anyone arguing this is an issue of free speech or “first they came for x, who’s next” is not arguing in good faith.. I’ve noticed a pattern of moving the goal post. The problem here is an insurrection and the loss of 5 American lives. Arguing there is not advantageous, easy, or particularly strong so the goal post moves to free speech leaving what happened at t…

Well, banning all bad people for the sake of all good is how many revolutions started, and resulted in much more deaths and other horrors.

If you want to live in a healthy state, you don't ban people who you disagree with. You integrate them into the system.

Re: Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler

#595

I think it's in the interest of the FBI and CIA to covertly run a service that caters to the extremists, so that they can monitor their activities. If they get driven underground, it will be harder to maintain tabs on them, but the create a platform that let's them talk among themselves, it seems as easy as shooting fish in a barrel!

Yes, it's called Facebook :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_%28surveillance_program%...

Re: Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler

#596

What happened to Silicon Valley? Just a few years ago, something like this would have triggered libertarian-leaning outrage, especially on HN. Remember the vigorous defenses on here of Backpage? Suddenly everyone’s clutching their pearls and cheering bans that are increasingly broad and unfocused.

> What happened to Silicon Valley? Just a few years ago, something like this would have triggered libertarian-leaning outrage, especially on HN.

On HN mods banned or pushed away ideological free speech supporters.

Re: Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler

#597

Before this gets too far I’d just like to point out that anyone arguing this is an issue of free speech or “first they came for x, who’s next” is not arguing in good faith.. I’ve noticed a pattern of moving the goal post. The problem here is an insurrection and the loss of 5 American lives. Arguing there is not advantageous, easy, or particularly strong so the goal post moves to free speech leaving what happened at t…

Curious why you chose to qualify “lives” with “American”. Does it make the lives somehow more relevant for you? More significant?
Post reply on HN