My man, math is pattern matching, not magic. So is logic. And computation. Please learn the basics before you discuss what LLMs can and can't do.
I'm no expert on math but "math is pattern matching" really sounds wrong. Maybe programming is mostly pattern matching but modern math is built on theory and proofs right?
When an LLM does it, it's pattern matching.
RL training amounts to pattern matching.
How does an LLM decode Base64? Decode algorithm? No - predictive pattern matching.
An LLM isn't predicting what a person thinks - it's predicting what a person does.
> This is the weirdest technology market that I’ve seen. The phenomenon you're seeing is well described here: "The Perfect AI Startup" ( https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2025-09-29/the... ) “It was the most absurd pitch meeting,” one investor who met with Murati said. “She was like, ‘So we’re doing an AI company with the best AI people, but we can’t answer any questions.’” Despite that vagueness, Murati…
I wonder how the investors feel now seeing what the initial product is?! Maybe investing in all well-connected AI startups is safer than trying to pick the winners and losers?
If you have N startups, and expect at least 1 of them to make >N times what you invest in each, then investing that amount in each one of them will still be expected to have a positive ROI. If none of them "hits it big" then you lose all the investment money, but if any of them grow enormously you profit. Trying to pick winners & losers in advance is much more difficult, investing in an entire business sector is the VC version of an index fund.
Most of the folks on this topic are focused on Meta and Yann’s departure. But, I’m seeing something different. This is the weirdest technology market that I’ve seen. Researchers are getting rewarded with VC money to try what remains a science experiment. That used to be a bad word and now that gets rewarded with billions of dollars in valuation.
Its not really an outlier If you think about Theranos, Magic leap, openai, anthropic they are all the same, one idea thats kinda plausible (well if you don't look too closely), have a slick demo, and well connected founders. Much as a lot of people dislike LeCun (just look at the blind posts about him) he did run and setup a very successful team inside meta, well nominally at least.
Ridiculous. Theranos was a literal crime scene. Its products didn't work at all, and physically couldn't work due to the nature of blood itself.
Magic Leap was an honest if overhyped effort that didn't achieve product-market fit.
Meanwhile, products from OpenAI and Anthropic have both done useful work for me this week.
The big tech companies are trying to make machines that replace all human labor. They call it artificial intelligence. Feel free to argue about definitions.
No no, let's define labor (labour?) first.
Whatever you're doing for money that you wouldn't do if you didn't need money.
Change my mind, Facebook was never invented by Zuck's genius All he's been responsible for is making it worse
Who gives a shit about who invented what? Social network wasn't even novel at the inception of FB. MySpace, Friendster, and Hi5 were already popular with millions of users. Zuck operated it well and was able to grow it from 0 to what it is today. That is what matters.
It didn't even start as a social network - it started off as a site to vote on the hotness of female Harvard students based on stolen photos.
It just so happened that he does appear to have some leadership and business talent, but IMO the company is still as creepy as it ever was.
Most of the folks on this topic are focused on Meta and Yann’s departure. But, I’m seeing something different. This is the weirdest technology market that I’ve seen. Researchers are getting rewarded with VC money to try what remains a science experiment. That used to be a bad word and now that gets rewarded with billions of dollars in valuation.
Lecun always struck me as an institutional clown who completely botched Meta's AI outlook.
Meta does not want to make ambitious risky R&D bets without immediate payoff. They also canned their AR guy who wanted to build custom chips for wearables like Apple.