581–590 of 1001 posts
So who will maintain it then? Either the EU or China I suppose. They can easily fund it. Maybe the Dutch should go ahead.
An EU solution would probably be much better. Would suck for Americans, though, they'd need to get up early to meet European office hours.
I wish this hadn't happened. I wonder what level of compartmentalisation inside DHS means they didn't see this as having sufficient downsides? I ask this, because I don't think anyone in the subject matter specialist space would have made a strong case "kill it, we don't need this" and I am sure if asked would have made a strong case "CRISSAKE WE NEED THIS DONT TOUCH IT" -But I could believe senior finance would do t…
> I wonder what level of compartmentalisation inside DHS means they didn't see this as having sufficient downsides? The National Vulnerability Database has been unable to keep up with the flow of CVEs for over a year now: - https://anchore.com/blog/national-vulnerability-database-opa... - https://www.cyberreport.io/news/cve-backlog-update-the-nvd-s... - https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/cve-backlog-update-nvd-st...…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perfect exmple of the "one-deep" conservative response. PP is looking for a pattern, finding, and abstaining from questioning or contextualizing it: Engaging only with the first or most obvious layer of an issue—never going deeper into context, nuance, or systemic causes. The quickest counterexample that comes to mind is Elizabeth Warren's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. It has returned billions to American cit…
I'm gonna have to stop engaging with you here if you start a comment by accusing someone to be a conservative. If your first reaction is putting people into political/ideological camps in order to make their arguments weaker and easier to attack form a holier than though political/ideological angle, it's game over for me as I like to judge actions objectively based on the outcomes, not conservative vs democrat, left…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
HN and founders will say "no politics here" on the regulated internet, drinking regulated water, eating regulated food, breathing regulated air.
Will all of these things be free of micro plastics and other contaminants? If so, is there a signup page?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did they promise to rebuild? If I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt (which I hate), it's a shotgun approach; cut things relentlessly and see what falls apart. Chaos engineering applied to a country and / or the world.
That’s exactly what it is, and they said as much repeatedly while campaigning. Voters, in their zealotry against the perceived status quo, failed to realize how much of what we have right now you don’t want to cut recklessly, as well as just how reckless the people that they were choosing to do that job were.
Perceived, not actual, because spreading lies and misinformation is what makes the most money for the ad sellers that make up 90% of our industry.
> A coalition of CVE Board members launched a new CVE Foundation "to ensure the long-term viability, stability, and independence of the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) Program." > https://www.thecvefoundation.org https://mastodon.social/@serghei/114346660986059236
So if the govt stops paying them they'll continue to do the work for free?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.enisa.europa.eu/news/another-step-forward-toward...
> https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/ They already did it. Great! Maybe we can ask them how to contribute to their software, as it seems to be proprietary at the moment? edit: lol, their manifest.json is still the React boilerplate: https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/manifest.json Their database seems to also only contain fairly recent CVEs (up until 2019? some CVEs are missing...) and not before that
> A coalition of CVE Board members launched a new CVE Foundation "to ensure the long-term viability, stability, and independence of the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) Program." > https://www.thecvefoundation.org https://mastodon.social/@serghei/114346660986059236
So if the govt stops paying them they'll continue to do the work for free?
I'm trying to steelman but I really can't think of a non- nefarious justification for this