Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
581–590 of 990 posts
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#582Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#583Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just so you know, switches in something as complicated as a laptop have a good chance at being connected to a processor , with firmware being the thing that determines what the switch does. So you still need trust, even with a physical switch. Source: write firmware for a living, and write drivers for physical switches.
That's a good point. I'm guessing that people calling for a "hardware switch" implicitly mean one that cannot be overridden by firmware. I.e., a traditional switch inline on the circuit(s) connecting the camera / microphone to the rest of the system.
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#584Earlier quoted context omitted.
I honestly can't remember the last time I used my camera during a company meeting, and I've been working remotely since March. So, there's definitely value to a built-in cover; in my case it would stay shut permanently.
A piece of tape does that without the security theatre of a cover.
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#585Apple Support: Wait until the light turn green, and then put a tape cover on your camera. ️
Or you know, if you never see a green light, you never had any problem. How about that? Tin foil much?
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#586Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#587Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#588Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Designed to protect your privacy, Mac notebooks have a camera indicator light to let you know when the camera is on. ... The main problem with that isn't that it is possible to disable the LED. The problem is that the LED is like a smoke detector, when it alerts you it's already too late, you are on fire (or your photo/video has already been taken). An indicator LED doesn't protect your privacy, it only tells you w…
On new Macs the light is a minimum 3 seconds even for a single frame photo. Anyone monitoring you has to turn the light in just to see if you are there, and what you are doing, and will likely have to watch for hours to catch any incriminating footage. You will have plenty of notice.
It's not just 'incriminating footage' that's the problem. There are perfectly legal sites I visit that I'd prefer didn't have a photo identifying me. Takes only seconds to snap such a picture if using an exploit like the safari one in April.
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#589Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#590Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has been the case for quite some time (10 years or so). I've torn apart two Macbooks to specifically test this and the LED is enabled when the camera receives power. It's impossible to disable with software. You can modify the Macbook of course, which is why the paranoid type will still use tape. Some attacks I've seen will take a photo with the camera as fast as possible so you might not notice, but the light w…
> You can modify the Macbook of course, which is why the paranoid type will still use tape. If the attacker has done this, they might as well just hide the camera somewhere else.
Your average blackmailer would be better off with the separate camera route (and likely wouldn't be sophisticated enough otherwise) but a state-sponsored attack could probably pull it off.