571–575 of 575 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's the LLM equivalent to email and a basic webpage?
https://noqta.tn/en/news/polsia-ai-autonomous-company-30m-fu... $1m ARR in 30 days :)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Disagreeing with me doesn't prove the point. Deciding he's a Zionist based on what you think he believes, rather than what he's actually said on record, that proves it. I’ve judged him to be a Zionist based on what he says. Not hearsay. Curious, I’ve never implied that I merely “think” he believes something—I’ve seen and heard it with my own eyes. Oh well, must be a miscommunication or misunderstanding. > Come back…
The five hour debate is the receipt. Quote something specific or we're done on Klein. You've spent this entire thread arguing that judging people by their ethnicity rather than their actual positions is wrong. Then you decided Klein is a Zionist not because of what he said, but because of what you've decided someone like him must believe. That's the definition of what you came here to argue against. Pro-Palestinians…
“Someone like him” what? An idiot? No, I believe he is a Zionist based on what he says, not based on the fact that he is an idiot.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The five hour debate is the receipt. Quote something specific or we're done on Klein. You've spent this entire thread arguing that judging people by their ethnicity rather than their actual positions is wrong. Then you decided Klein is a Zionist not because of what he said, but because of what you've decided someone like him must believe. That's the definition of what you came here to argue against. Pro-Palestinians…
> You've spent this entire thread arguing that judging people by their ethnicity rather than their actual positions is wrong. Then you decided Klein is a Zionist not because of what he said, but because of what you've decided someone like him must believe. “Someone like him” what? An idiot? No, I believe he is a Zionist based on what he says, not based on the fact that he is an idiot.
I wouldn’t cast any aspersions of anyone else's intelligence if I were in that position.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You've spent this entire thread arguing that judging people by their ethnicity rather than their actual positions is wrong. Then you decided Klein is a Zionist not because of what he said, but because of what you've decided someone like him must believe. “Someone like him” what? An idiot? No, I believe he is a Zionist based on what he says, not based on the fact that he is an idiot.
Several days and that’s all you came back with. I wouldn’t cast any aspersions of anyone else's intelligence if I were in that position.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I personally don't find religion necessary to live an ethical and fulfilling life "I personally don't find science necessary to live a modern and fulfilling life" (I say, as I type using a computer on the internet) People love to remove attribution when it suits their short-sighted view. Just as you can attribute something I enjoy today to science, I can attribute something you enjoy today to religion.
That's true, you don't need to be a practitioner of science to live a modern and fulfilling life. Are you trying to argue that some things I consider valuable were first developed within religion (which I won't argue with, though I think there's more to dig into there than might be immediately obvious), or that I need to personally practice religion to live an ethical and fulfilling life, and I just don't realize it?…
ethics comes from religion. modernity comes from science.
if you say - "I don't need religion to tell me not to kill people"
then i say - "ok. so, why don't you go around killing people?"
you say - "i just don't have the desire to". or "i am compassionate"
i say - "ok. you do you. what about me? I wish to kill people. what's stopping me?"
you say - "consequences. police. law & order"
i say - "so if there was no police in a suburb, or no punishment for killing, I can kill people?"
Your argument falls dead.
Because religion tells us one thing - the law of Karma - there is no place or time in the universe where an action does not have a consequence. Regardless of your belief in God or the soul or spirit or afterlife or past lives.
Almost sounds like newton drew inspiration from the old golden rule - Treat others as you'd like to be treated.
Why? Because every action has an equal and opposite reaction - you WILL be treated exactly as you treated others, whether in this life or the next. Ergo, if you don't want to be killed, don't kill. if you want to be killed, go ahead.