Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Also, it's clear that a military officer is obviously a legitimate military target in a war. Former
> Former According to reports, he was the commander of the submarine when it was conducting bombing missions on civilian targets in Ukraine. What possibly compels you to believe your "former" qualifier has any relevance?
According to the quote above, he "could have been at the helm", and his family has claimed he hasn't.
Something, something, due process.