Booo bring back the 4" iPhone SE
iPhone Air
571–580 of 1001 posts
Re: iPhone Air
#572TBH, this phone looks crap. I'm sure SJ would have hated the form factor.
Re: iPhone Air
#573Clearly there is a disconnect between what commenters want and what actually sells.
$0.25 fentanyl sells good. Doesn't mean it's what people need.
Fentanyl is a fascinating market case study because nobody actually wants fentanyl, they want oxycodone or heroin.
It's the "market data reveals that consumers actually want the cheapest shittiest airplane tickets" of drugs. And you can read that in a couple different ways.
Re: iPhone Air
#574I want an extra thick model instead, let’s call it iPhone Travel (or Ultra?). Just thick enough so the cameras are no longer sticking out. Give me an all-week battery instead of an all-day one. Slim down the power usage and give a power saver mode that actually does make a difference. Let me go on a weekend trip in nature or festival without having to carry extra hardware or having to look for public charging station…
This is why I mostly stick with the Moto G models which have easily multi-day battery and cost sub $250.
I’ve had a bunch of Moto G phones, I love them. This round I decided to try their upper midrange Edge line.
I found a deal on a Moto Edge 2024 and it’s fantastic. It’s so light and compact vs the Moto G Power, and still can go two full days no problem. The camera is excellent as well, which was my only real gripe with the G phones.
It can plug into my USB-C monitor and act like a Chromebook (more or less). I play Minecraft with my kids this way.
Re: iPhone Air
#575If you’ve been following the rumour mill and also understand Tim “zero waste” Cook’s MO of reusing parts in multiple models, this whole thing makes a lot more sense when you realise they’re going to release a folding iPhone next year, and it’ll be the thickness of two Airs.
Reusing parts for them, massive piles of software-bricked e-waste for us.
Re: iPhone Air
#576This is 100% going to bend, right?
Re: iPhone Air
#577If you’ve been following the rumour mill and also understand Tim “zero waste” Cook’s MO of reusing parts in multiple models, this whole thing makes a lot more sense when you realise they’re going to release a folding iPhone next year, and it’ll be the thickness of two Airs.
(side note) And the folding phone will be a "Apple First".
I wonder if they still still have a stupid camera notch on the device. They is no point (to me) have a thin phone even you end up having a 5mm notch the size of your phone
Re: iPhone Air
#578Titanium? I thought they’d learned that lesson with the Powerbook G4.
Re: iPhone Air
#579Really?! It’s 2025 and this is what they saw as important. We need repairable tech not this peanut butter and jelly nonsense that’ll be in the trash heap literal months from now. Feels like we’re back to the old Performa, Centris and Quadra era of rolling our more and more barely differentiated products u til folks loose track of what to buy. Have you been in an Apple Store recently, it’s starting to feel pretty clut…
The Google Ad states; “If it feels like your phone hasn’t change in years, .. maybe it’s time to change your phone.. Google Pixel 10 Pro”
Re: iPhone Air
#580My experience is "air" in an Apple product's name means battery life is measured in tens of minutes and the fan makes a horrible racket because the CPU is underpowered and intended for only short suprts of activity. That's fine for a laptop because you can keep it plugged in and use your other computer to do tasks that require CPU, but not appropriate for a mobile phone that you may want to operate untethered for hours at a time.
I'm sure Apple's official word on this is battery life is sufficient for more than a couple of hours of untethered stand-by. I'm just questioning the wisdom of the naming convention. They trained their user community to understand that "air" means low-CPU power / low battery life / thinner package. Are there enough potential customers who will prioritize thin form factor over usability?
Nevermind. I just answered my own question.
[Edit: I understand the Apple fanbois will want to down-vote this, but look at the second sentence of the second paragraph. I am not saying the iPhone Air will be bad. I am saying that the "Air" name has, in the past, been applied to some pretty sub-standard products. I am asking if it's wise to apply a name that has been used for lower-end products to new products that aren't "lower end."]