Earlier quoted context omitted.
Horseshoes? As in “close enough”?
Or, as in, “Ouch, man! You hit my foot!”
Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
571–580 of 1001 posts
Re: Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
#572Everyone knows this was “made by AI” because there’s no way in hell I would ever have the time. These models might not be able to sit there and build an entire project from scratch yet, but if what you need is some help adding the next control panel page, Claude’s got your back on that.
Re: Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
#573I work for Google, and I just got done with my work day. I was just writing I guess what you'd call "AI generated code." But the code completion engine is basically just good at finishing the lines I'm writing. If I'm writing "function getAc..." it's smart enough to complete to "function getActionHandler()", and maybe suggest the correct arguments and a decent jsdoc comment. So basically, it's a helpful productivity…
So this is basically the google CEO saying "a quarter of our terminal inputs is written by a glorified tab completion"?
Re: Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
#574Re: Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
#575Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do people find these AI auto complete things helpful? I was trying the XCode one and it kept suggesting API calls that don't exist. I spent more time fixing its errors than I would have spent typing the correct API call.
I often delete large chunks of it unread if it doesn't do what I expected. It's much like copy and paste; deleting code doesn't take long.
Re: Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
#576I work for Google, and I just got done with my work day. I was just writing I guess what you'd call "AI generated code." But the code completion engine is basically just good at finishing the lines I'm writing. If I'm writing "function getAc..." it's smart enough to complete to "function getActionHandler()", and maybe suggest the correct arguments and a decent jsdoc comment. So basically, it's a helpful productivity…
Do people find these AI auto complete things helpful? I was trying the XCode one and it kept suggesting API calls that don't exist. I spent more time fixing its errors than I would have spent typing the correct API call.
Re: Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
#577Earlier quoted context omitted.
I often delete large chunks of it unread if it doesn't do what I expected. It's much like copy and paste; deleting code doesn't take long.
So your test is "seems to work"?
(By "unread" I meant that I don't look very closely before deleting if it looks weird.)
And then write tests. Or perhaps I wrote the test first.
Re: Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
#578Re: Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
#579Earlier quoted context omitted.
In Java, 25% of the code is import statements and curly braces
You generally don’t write those by hand though. I’m pretty sure around 50% of the code I write is already auto-complete, without any AI.
Re: Google CEO says more than a quarter of the company's new code is created by AI
#580I work for Google, and I just got done with my work day. I was just writing I guess what you'd call "AI generated code." But the code completion engine is basically just good at finishing the lines I'm writing. If I'm writing "function getAc..." it's smart enough to complete to "function getActionHandler()", and maybe suggest the correct arguments and a decent jsdoc comment. So basically, it's a helpful productivity…
The general public has a very different idea of that though and I frequently meet people very surprised the entire profession hasn’t been automated yet based on headlines like this.