Bummer. I often use like vs dislike ratios as a gauge on whether a video is worth watching. If I see a 3,000 up / 48 down video on a topic I'm interested in there's a really good chance the video is great. I'm a small time creator (~13.5k subs) and don't care at all about upvotes or downvotes being public. There's only been a handful of videos out of hundreds that received more downvotes than expected because the vid…
the fact it isn't optional is the biggest red flag, why not just let channels choose if they want to show dislikes?
Making the dislike count private across YouTube
571–580 of 1001 posts
Re: Making the dislike count private across YouTube
#572Re: Making the dislike count private across YouTube
#573Re: Making the dislike count private across YouTube
#574Re: Making the dislike count private across YouTube
#575I suspect that not showing the dislikes drives up engagement, but in my experience as a user I rarely look at the number of dislikes to judge a video.
Re: Making the dislike count private across YouTube
#576By referring to the act of disliking the video as an "attack", they are framing this change as one which protects users, when in fact, only a small minority post videos, and a smaller portion among them are bothered by dislikes. In fact, the change is user-hostile, removing one channel for users to see whether a video is of low quality (inaccurate description, containing false information, etc.), and improving advert…
That isn't what they said at all. They are talking about actual attacks where a group of people share their objections to a video and encourage everyone to click on dislike. Do you really think that this kind of group objection should be sponsored and enabled?
Re: Making the dislike count private across YouTube
#577Any chance we can make a browser extension that registers votes of and shows vote counts for installed users? Google would fight it. But we could always side-load if they do.
I'd be interested in helping if anyone is working on a project. I'd also like to see this done web-wide.
And the results could be limited to people you follow/follow you or all results. Just a nice way to see what people are talking about.
Not sure this belongs in the same extension. But both are manual fixes for social media problems.
Re: Making the dislike count private across YouTube
#578This is like Amazon letting anyone review a product, but only showing you how many 5-star reviews there are. Completely useless.
The usefulness of data depends on its quality. If people are submitting lots of thoughtful 1-star reviews then yeah, it's a stupid move. But if when you looked at 1-star reviews, and they were basically the junk ramblings of trolls then you might get a better signal of quality buy just ignoring them.
And this move is a clear signal also, of whose pocket Google are in.
Re: Making the dislike count private across YouTube
#579By referring to the act of disliking the video as an "attack", they are framing this change as one which protects users, when in fact, only a small minority post videos, and a smaller portion among them are bothered by dislikes. In fact, the change is user-hostile, removing one channel for users to see whether a video is of low quality (inaccurate description, containing false information, etc.), and improving advert…
That isn't what they said at all. They are talking about actual attacks where a group of people share their objections to a video and encourage everyone to click on dislike. Do you really think that this kind of group objection should be sponsored and enabled?
Re: Making the dislike count private across YouTube
#580The issue is that it's so critical to learning these days, and so much of the entertainment I consume comes from it. Can't say I'm surprised though. Social media has it's positives and enjoyable properties, but in the end, they will manipulate the platform in the most fiscally advantageous way.