Live data from Hacker News

Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

reuters.com

561–570 of 591 posts

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are being pedantic. I have 2 family members who are/were special agents for the FBI. Much of their job is harvesting evidence to build cases by spying, which frequently comes more in the form of “spying” in the way we saw in The Sopranos. The FBI is also the premier counter-espionage organization within the US, so it is tasked with spying on suspected foreign / turned spies. It is much more than a spy network, bu…

All cleared citizens are subject to warrantless search at any time by the FBI, some for the remainder of their life. You don't have to be a suspect to fall within their panopticon.

That’s at least partly because upping application for a security clearance, they are signing a contract to do that.

We don’t know how much the Trump political officials managed to avoid those onboarding requirements. It has been widely reported that at least some of them bypassed eligibility requirements and polygraph. It’s probably not a huge leap to assume these same people were not required to consent to these forever-after-searches.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#562

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They absolutely advertised it when it was released and every journalist knows about it. Kashmir Patel went out of his way to bypass security protocols for onboarding his political hires (for the US’s premiere domestic intelligence service!). If he wanted to be secure, all he had to do was not get in the way of the FBI’s natural processes. Also, this wouldn’t have happened if POTUS had hired someone with relevant FBI…

> POTUS had hired someone with relevant FBI experience instead of a political hack. well what percentage of highly-rated FBI people have actually enabled that feature? did FBI had some internal recommendation to enable that feature? FBI isn't NSA people...

You are high on the first peak of Dunning Krueger right now.

The Director of the FBI is an immensely powerful position, unlike the average secretory/assistant in some FBI field office. Even the FBI Special Agents are taught OpsSec in depth at FBI cadet school and it is reinforced at every additional relevant training.

The reason Patel wasn’t is because he’s unqualified to be in the department and was a political hire who almost certainly bypassed the normal security protocols when he was hired. The FBI has an entire detail, not unlike that of Secret Service, who both secures the physical person / transport of the Director, but who also maintains intelligence about threats and OpsSec, which should cover this specifically scenario. In other words, Patel didn’t need to know about this security precaution himself — he just needed to not stifle his team from protecting him.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#563
post #554

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And? What does that have to do with the absence of witnesses of a sex trafficking ring involving anyone else? This isn’t even news, it was a big deal back in the day and is covered extensively in the report about the DoJ’s conduct. Read the reports and consider the context; this is a nothingburger. But because the conspiracy theory has been started, everything that happens will be read as supporting it. Epstein had v…

> And? What does that have to do with the absence of witnesses of a sex trafficking ring involving anyone else? Did you just ask, in a post about evidence being taken and keep from investigators, why there isn't evidence? > This isn’t even news, it was a big deal back in the day and is covered extensively in the report about the DoJ’s conduct. Then why is it news FROM TODAY/YESTERDAY? --- In a March 19 deposition wit…

That computer and surveillance equipment was removed from Epstein's home and withheld from law enforcement throughout his Florida case has been public since 2020. That Riley Kiraly possessed the equipment was known to the lead prosecutor as well. [46;176]

You can CTRL-F "computer" and get 92 matches indicating their importance:

https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/do....

It seems that the only "news" is the bit that you mentioned about Indyke/Riley. Indyke apparently was not involved in the Florida case. At least he isn't mentioned in the linked DOJ report among Epstein's counsel.

I don't know what it would take for it to be deemed necessary to seize the equipment that the prosecution failed to get almost 20 years ago.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#564
post #357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Crores are pretty distinctive.

That's coming from Google, the racism is coming from the commentators.

I have no problem with racism; I have a problem with hypocrisy.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#565

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like what? We have two presidents, including the current one, that took multiple trips to a pedophile island. What skeletons could be greater than accusations of punching a child in the face after they bit the dude’s penis during forced sodomy?

There is no credible evidence that either of the Presidents you alluded to visited "the island". It's amazing to see conspiracy theories promulgated on HN.

Its amazing for you to stick your head to your ass pedo protector

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#566
post #387

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzaoHPWfkbE That was electoral event with mandatory presence. This is nothing like Stalin's rallies where people themselves organized and attended, e.g.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eC6bzBTmmhU > new unified history textbook. The "Talks about Important" school ideology lessons. Putin's propaganda article on Ukraine history (of course no relation to real history). Yup.…

>Yes, and these TV channels now have less popularity than gardening channels. Nobody knowing anything about Russia would make such a gross mistake like you've just made. It is like you'd be discussing physics problems while not knowing Newton's laws. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_in_Russia "Television is the most popular medium in Russia, with 74% of the population watching national television channels rou…

> Nobody knowing anything about Russia would make such a gross mistake like you've just made.

I'm Russian with parts of my family in Russia.

> It is like you'd be discussing physics problems while not knowing Newton's laws. > "Television is the most popular medium in Russia, with 74% of the population watching national television channels routinely "

Yes, and according to MediaScope, a company that tracks the TV ratings in Russia, "Evening with Solovyiev" is at the 78-th place: https://mediascope.net/data/

You might not know this, but Russia still has multiple TV channels, and people can (and do) switch between them.

This is both good and bad news. Good news is that there are very few actual rabid nationalists in Russia, and once the war is over, Russian population will gladly return to normality. The bad news is that the war will be over only once Putin dies or is deposed.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#567

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The corpses of Irans’s leadership have us right where they want us

It's relative. We're in a pretty bad spot relative to where we were before the attack, and so is the world economy. The Iranian regime is doing much better so far, relative to where they should be after a joint military attack from the US/Israel and maybe even relative to where they were just a few months ago. The previous Ayatollah was 86 and had multiple bouts of pancreatic cancer. He was on deaths door, Iran was d…

The son seems to have a distinct lack of “vitality” lol

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#568
post #552

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is all fine and well, but misses one little detail: drones. In the past conflicts US troops were more or less unreachable for the enemy unless they were advancing on the ground in a challenging terrain like dense jungles or mountains, where an enemy could ambush them. Other then that, US had air superiority, overwhelming firepower and excellent reconnaissance. After the war in Ukraine things are very different.…

> This is all fine and well, but misses one little detail: drones. That's why A-10s are patrolling the 6 mile wide straight for 2 hours a flight. They can take out the larger Iranian drones much cheaper than any other platform we have. The small dones can't get very far and the US is exceptional at electronic warfare. But that doesn't really change anything, it just maintains the status quo of the straight being too…

Yes, in principle, this (limited ground invasion to protect the straight) can be done. The cost - both in lives, money and political capital - will be enormous.

One comment though.

> The small dones can't get very far and the US is exceptional at electronic warfare.

There is currently one county in the world which is exceptional in electronic warfare against drones - Ukraine. Then there is Russia. Everybody else is leagues behind, including US. Without real combat experience and proven technologies ready for deployment all your money and fancy equipment are worth nothing. THAADs have the most advanced radars, did it help them in UAE recently?

In Ukraine they basically had to build a network of mini-factories with 3d printers and ad-hoc repurpose of old weapons right behind the front lines. This is to be able to counter Russian drones by enabling fast iteration on EW. US has nothing like that in current doctrine and it’s not clear if this can even be deployed in an expeditionary corps model.

I’m not saying of course that it’s impossible for US to open the straight by military means or to defeat IRGC otherwise, it’s just that it’s a very hard task which got even harder after advancement in drones.

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#569
post #357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Crores are pretty distinctive.

That's coming from Google, the racism is coming from the commentators. I have no problem with racism; I have a problem with hypocrisy.

How is it racism when it is literally written by/in Indians? As in literally has it as the locale and uses terms only really used in India?

You might as well be complaining someone notes ‘it’s Chinese’ when something written in Simplified Chinese by the CCP gets posted?

Re: Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director's personal email

#570
post #554

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And? What does that have to do with the absence of witnesses of a sex trafficking ring involving anyone else? This isn’t even news, it was a big deal back in the day and is covered extensively in the report about the DoJ’s conduct. Read the reports and consider the context; this is a nothingburger. But because the conspiracy theory has been started, everything that happens will be read as supporting it. Epstein had v…

> And? What does that have to do with the absence of witnesses of a sex trafficking ring involving anyone else? Did you just ask, in a post about evidence being taken and keep from investigators, why there isn't evidence? > This isn’t even news, it was a big deal back in the day and is covered extensively in the report about the DoJ’s conduct. Then why is it news FROM TODAY/YESTERDAY? --- In a March 19 deposition wit…

> Did you just ask, in a post about evidence being taken and keep from investigators, why there isn't evidence?

The sibling commenter addressed the timeline, but you still seem to be missing the point: harddrive or no harddrive, there would have been witnesses - at least the victims- of the grand conspiracy theory involving other men. Instead, you're limited to Maria Farmer (26 when she was victimized by Epstein, rarely seen in public because she makes wild accusations about random people including the journalists interviewing her - she is currently convinced that Whitney Webb murdered a chef) and Virginia Giuffre (underage victim and confirmed fabulist, who also, for the record, said Trump did nothing wrong and endorsed his Presidency). There never was any evidence of the organized conspiracy of elites part of the Epstein story. Read the testimony! Again and again the women say there were no other men.

You're concluding that computer equipment Epstein had every reason to hide from law enforcement to cover up more concrete evidence of his solicitation of minors actually contains evidence of a totally different thing that nobody was claiming at the time - a grand sex trafficking conspiracy involving powerful billionaires and politicians. But there's no reason to think that's the case.

At the end of the day, if any of this happened, these women could come forward. They're entitled to millions in settlement money already (and you don't even have to go to court to get it - its an administrative process, not a judicial one; and it's big money, Annie Farmer alone got at least 1.5 million), and naming additional names would open the door to even more! They already have some of the best civil attorneys in the country! An unrelated case has already shown that you can win a civil suit against the most powerful man in the country, even with no evidence besides your testimony! That they have not, combined with the total lack of evidence, suggests they don't exist.

But because the mindset behind this is conspiratorial, it will always be "there IS evidence - it's just being covered up!". And no amount of releases will ever be enough - because they can't show it to be true, which just proves there's a coverup! It's never-ending.

Post reply on HN