Live data from Hacker News

Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

blog.google

561–570 of 593 posts

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah id argue that all existence is equally sacred. But consciousness is where that is manifest most visibly.

It legitimately scares me that so many proponents of AI don't hold being a living, breathing real-life entity as being important.

Important for what? To enjoy a piece of art one need to know how it was created?

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#562

Some random predictions about what AI image generation tools will do/are doing to art: 1. The narrative/life of the artist becomes a lot more important. The most successful artists are ones that craft a story around their life and art, and don't just create stuff and stop. This will become even more important. 2. Originality matters more than ever. By design, these tools can only copy and mix things that already exis…

Everything is a remix. Humans' rarely original, creativity still built off influences. AI image generation is nothing if not good at remixing.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#563
post #492

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The artists life might've been highly affectual and shows in the art, but they doesn't mean the viewer cares about it - at best only so far as it makes the art more enjoyable.

The continual interest in museums, biographies etc. on figures like Van Gogh seem to indicate otherwise. People are very interested in the lives of artists, and without the struggle narrative behind Van Gogh, it’s unclear that he would be famous at all.

i think you got the cause and effect the wrong way around - people are interested in van gogh's life because he's already famous (while his art can stand on it's own without needing his life story being part of it).

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#564
post #561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It legitimately scares me that so many proponents of AI don't hold being a living, breathing real-life entity as being important.

Important for what? To enjoy a piece of art one need to know how it was created?

In a great part, yes?

When I see an early realistic painting, I'm impressed by the skilled hand of the artist. When I see an impressionist one, I'm awed by their ability to go through the whole process and to know which strokes are the best ones to achieve such a result. When I see a modern oil painting, I marvel at that someone takes that medium and does such things with it, where maybe the ease of editing the digital content would make it so much more convenient.

Then when I see old paintings with very particular pigments, certain blues or reds for instance, I enjoy thinking about the whole chain of events that got them there; the need of creativity even in getting the colors you wanted.

We do love a pretty picture, but so do we love a display of skill and hard work.

Before GenAI this value was mostly self-evident, but by now it's becoming less and less so; and what's worse, it's rife with one thing we don't love for sure - which is lies.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#566
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like the complete opposite is true. Artists aren't doing it for the money. With advanced tools like these they wouldve iterated much faster and created much grander designs. Art is about pushing limits of what's possible and AI just raises those limits.

Art is about creating something from scratch. This isn't creating anything but cobbling together elements of scraped/stolen content to generate an imitation of prior work.

While I categorically reject this argument, it would be stronger if you at least attempted to address one or two of the obvious counters like collage.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#567
post #561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It legitimately scares me that so many proponents of AI don't hold being a living, breathing real-life entity as being important.

Important for what? To enjoy a piece of art one need to know how it was created?

In Chess this has been going on for a while. Story of humans playing Chess is still entertaining - while AI making amazing moves seems to be less news worthy in my perception.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#568
post #561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It legitimately scares me that so many proponents of AI don't hold being a living, breathing real-life entity as being important.

Important for what? To enjoy a piece of art one need to know how it was created?

Are you a nihilist? Is there nothing sacred to you about the miracle of life that causes wonder? It's important for its own sake.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#569

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not everyone can afford the best interior designers, my sister had hired one to design the interiors of her new cafe.. the designer did not provide any renders, just a basic CAD drawing. Then I used nano banana pro to create some renders from the photos of the empty space. These turned out great, and she decided to ditch the designer and use the designs created by nano banana. The cafe has opened now, and it looks gr…

@fasteddie31003 and @ghoshbinayak, Can you share the designs that you created?

https://imgur.com/a/lSIYTYr

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#570

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I started with sketchup to make basic floor plans and house shapes. I had a rough idea of the style of the home. I picked "Transitional English Estate" since the build site is out on a farm that sorta looks like the Cotswolds. I used AI in this process to get rough renders and feedback on the floorplan. I then took that basic floorplan and house dimensions to a Draftsman who did a lot of tweaking to get it up to code…

super interesting - can you share some of the other elements. screenshots of the sketchup model, the AI image output, etc? would you recommend this workflow to others, or just noting that it is what you did? any regrets, road blocks, frustrations? a ball park price would also be interesting: total cost of sketchup license + ai token cost + fivver modeler + draftsman etc. I assume under $1k?

$20k for permit-ready building docs.
Post reply on HN