Live data from Hacker News

Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

theguardian.com

561–570 of 960 posts

Re: Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

#561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What groups are you talking about

Publish a cartoon about the prophet Mohamed and some of the groups will make themselves known to you.

What does that very specific example have to do with broad censorship as a phenomenon in media? Like how often do you think TV networks and streaming services are removing depictions of Mohammed in the stuff they make or license?

Re: Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

#562
post #165

Oh, I have a question to all of the people who pirate but live in a country where that’s illegal and punished (with huge fines, I assume). I’m very interested in listening to some stories of how it’s technically done (vpn, a seedbox, or you just keep things simple and don’t care). E.g. I’ve been trying sophisticated backlists of IPs, but I have no idea whether they work. But even more I am interested in a legal aspec…

With torrents you'll want a VPN. Usenet is generally safe just thanks to TLS unless you're uploading content. For that I'd use a VPN. But unlike torrent, Usenet isn't P2P so I can just download at my full internet bandwidth and don't need to hope there are enough seeders out there maintaining it or that I maintain some magic upload / download ratio.

What about torrents and Tor? Moral aspects aside. (Personally, I’d not do it, out of respect for the network.) Just curious about it theoretically, how this technology and its ‘moderation’ (let’s call it that) works.

Re: Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

#564

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Subtitles are often a very dumb failure point, especially when English subtitles aren't available in half the world for basically no reason.

I have another problem, which is that my wife is Japanese and I’m American, and if we watch a French movie then I want the English subs and she wants the Japanese subs. Making that work with streaming services is very painful.

I had never thought of this before. What is the solution? Can any video software show two subtitles at once?

Re: Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

#565

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Piracy also offers: 0. Ability to watch offline! 1. Ability to fix subtitle issues with minimal tweeks like change size or moving location. 1.2 Ability to get subtitles if they aren't offered (or offered in your language) 2. Ability to normalize audio. 3. Ability to buffer videos when on a poor connection. 4. Ability to create collections, organize, and track your movie as you wish 5. Arbitrary number of user account…

[flagged]

I stopped pirating in college when I got a job and was making enough money to pay for movies I wanted to watch. But I miss almost every single one of the points listed so much so that I have begun purchasing dvd or Blu-ray copies of movies and shows I would otherwise stream, and ripping the content for my own use. It is an absurd amount of work, but the end result is a better experience than streaming in almost every way.

If I could legally download movies and shows (paying full price for them) I absolutely would.

Re: Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

#566
post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also doesn’t track user and send a bunch of telemetry

Except for our ip address, timestamp and torrent metadata https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com

That has like a 50% precision rate for me. Around half of the reported torrents is stuff I've never seen.

Re: Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

#567
post #530
post #459

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know, 4k HEVC at 15,000mbps looks plenty good to me.

...what service offers 15Gbps stream?

None. No matter how much you pay, the best you'll ever get from streaming services is a bit-starved encode with fake film grain in a bullshit codec that'll look worse than 720p DVD rips you'd find on Zamunda yet still require more power to decode...

Re: Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

#568

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tax on recordable media is unfair because honest people who don't pirate anything also have to pay. As with the case above, honest people get screwed the most.

Wait a second, if I paid a tax allowing me to legally doenload/record..... what's dishonest in it? It's basically a subscription.

[deleted]

Re: Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

#569
post #386

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mind elaborating?

"Look, doing something illegal offers a lot of benefits for me! I must be a genius"

You’re not considering that many of these points are in no way illegal to provide as a streaming service.

Re: Streaming services are driving viewers back to piracy

#570

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In audio processing, the more precise term for it is compression (dynamically adjust gain). Normalization usually means that the gain is adjusted so that the highest volume meets a certain level. (Like what YouTube does)

Compression is an entirely different thing. Compression isn't just gain adjustment - it's a specific type of audio processing that increases perceived "gain" (loudness) of the entire source audio by "compressing" the levels of loud frequencies & increasing the levels of quiet frequencies. Normalization increases gain of all frequencies at any given point-in-time while reducing gain of all frequencies at other points…

> Normalization increases gain of all frequencies at any given point-in-time while reducing gain of all frequencies at other points in time.

When you do that then the difference between the loudest and the quietest part of the audio gets reduced. That's dynamic range reduction.

Post reply on HN