Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anyone that can explain what the people on X mean when they comment that it was "intentional"? I'm probably out of the loop but this feels super out of place to me. These are only a small amount directly from the replies to the tweet you shared, you can find many more if you keep scrolling. https://x.com/27steph77/status/1884799302947500062 https://x.com/Aangtweets/status/1884793609326666014 https://x.com/Ray44444444…
Because too Allah-damned-many people are worm-brained conspiracy theorists nowadays: https://archive.is/sS3W1
Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
561–570 of 738 posts
Re: Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
#562Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, if it wasn't, it certainly is now! ;)
?? I have no idea what this means. Are you implying your reply would make the previous post become dismissive?
Here, "it" means "your involvement in this discussion"
To put it a bit more plainly, and apologies if it is hard to hear currently, I'd find this very helpful to hear this if I were you:
- The first comment was objectively, straightforwardly, dismissive. You questioned one statistic, then ignored the thrust of the comment and the comments leading up to it, instead framing the difficulty as "modern computers have a hard time with 3D", eliding the main point communicated.
- You then replied to my comment to tell me I'm wrong, it wasn't dismissive. This is also, in itself, dismissive. I had already fisked you, and I felt bad, so I didn't want to get overly literal and criticize you roughly again, in front of a crowd, so soon. So, I choose to keep it brief, rely on your ability to recognize the irony in your reply being dismissive in telling me the original comment wasn't dismissive, especially when combined with the wink.
To be hyper clear, it's...unusual...when communicating with others to ignore most of what they just said and fixate on one illustrative part of what they said, then when told you were being dismissive, to just say "I wasn't being dismissive" and put the burden on the listener. It's so unusual as to be objectively amusing.
You certainly did not mean to be dismissive, but you were. I sympathize with the reflex, I am 100% sure I've made many similar errors in my own journey, probably more than you ever have and will. It is a problem area for me.
With humility, I'd humbly suggest that when given feedback, rather than briefly asserting the feedback is incorrect, you come with curiosity and ask why it came off that way.
Given their answer, you'll be able to tell very quickly if the person is having a bad day/picking on you, or if you were unclear.
Re: Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
#563Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Serious question: Why is 3D such a hard problem for modern computers? I could imagine a plane enters a cylinder of airspace near the airport and automatically communicates by radio waves information about itself. Then, HAL9000 can provide guidance as a landing plan. Maybe I'm getting older. Maybe it is a more modern phenomena, enabled by a steady diet of 30 second videos. Either way, I'm quite disturbed, regularly,…
We’ve built good enough systems that lots of people have never had engage with the complexity of reality?
Re: Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
#564Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
With all due respect, Hacker News is not the place for making blanket assertions with no references. Please post a citation if you have one. Otherwise please don't waste readers' time with unfounded rumors.
There was also a lawsuit against the last Sec of Transportation which I believe was related but not too sure.
Re: Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
#565Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Where did that come from? There are some things in life that don't revolve around identity politics, and I'd venture to say, ATC is one of them.
They replaced a skill assessment with a completely bizarre biography test where for instance you got +15 points if you listed science as your worst subject, but 0 if you listed math, English, history or P.E.
Then they leaked the answers to black organizations, as well as special keywords to put in their resume to go to top of the pile.
The students who spent years and thousands of dollars and aced the skill assessment but then failed the biographical test are suing in a class action.
Re: Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
#566Earlier quoted context omitted.
The controller will not take blame. It is a blameless culture where mistakes are expected and analyzed and learned from.
[flagged]
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5116332-trump-0f...
Re: Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
#567Earlier quoted context omitted.
> everyone is expecting to be fired regardless of their experience and skill. How do you know this?
Because I live here.
The reason i say this is you mention experience and skill but ignore whether such people are in _roles_ that need to exist at all, which is what is being questioned, not the worth of individuals in those roles.
Re: Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
#568Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please expand. I fly out of DCA and IAD frequently (and JFK and LGA). I’ve gone through the process next to politicians, though I’ve never recognized any highly ranked ones (e.g. Pelosi, McConnell, etc.). What’s the difference they experience?
I watched Warren and some of her staff cut the entire pre-check line at BOS. They still had to walk through the metal detectors but without any bags, they whisked through. I got to cut the line at security once because I was on the job, I was completely embarrassed.
Re: Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
#569Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow. I thought Trump instantly blaming DEI was ridiculous in this case but I’m somewhat reconsidering. How much less of a shortage of ATCs would we have now if it wasn’t for that debacle?
> How much less of a shortage of ATCs would we have now if it wasn’t for that debacle? Probably not much, considering the biggest constraining factor is pay. For example, San Carlos airport is shutting down ATC entirely because they can't pay anyone enough to live locally to the tower: https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/bay-area-airport-losing-... There would be no problem filling the seats if the compensation was h…
I could see this maybe being an issue in the bay area but outside of that area that pretty good pay.
Re: Commercial jet collides with Black Hawk helicopter near Reagan airport
#570I wonder if this administration's firing of many FAA civil positions and the federal worker "buyouts" are responsible.
The intelligent response would be "probably not, but we'll see what the investigation says". But imagine if the tables were turned politically. Fox News would be going off 24/7 about "DEI" or some such for weeks on end. That strategy seems to be successful, so I would expect the other side to start employing it more as well. Having a bunch of harried, overworked people stressed about their jobs and the future certain…
I don't think POTUS was serious because he also claimed people shouldn't be hesitant to fly.
'He is later asked by a reporter if people should be hesitant to fly, and he says: "No, not at all."'