Live data from Hacker News

Rarbg Is No More

web.archive.org

561–570 of 679 posts

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not Google's primary purpose.

Well, printing was going to be for instruction. And then radio. And TV. And the internet. We're so instructed we've gotta wear ad-blockers.

Instruction.. on what to buy, how to live and what to want.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#562

Sorry to see it go. While we are at it, an honest question: Why should _anyone_ undertake the legal risk, monetary cost and development time burden for maintaining a public tracker? What would release teams gain from setting up encoding pipelines and upholding their networking infrastructure?

Because some people grew up poor and without much access to content. Then they learned about this thing in the 90’s called the internet where you can share information with anyone for free.

So said poor person learned programming and other skills to get a tracker working so that they could give back to others who are in the same boat.

This way the poor kid (who’s family can’t afford lunch, let alone a 10€ /month Disney + subscription) can chat with their rich friends at the lunch table about the latest marvel film the week it releases and god forbid, fit in for once.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#564

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorting by number of seeders will probably get you a file that is fast to download because of the number of seeders, but it will rarely get you quality. Let's go take a stroll over to a popular public torrent site and search for, say, a recent superhero movie. I see 100 (!) results for that movie's name. 49 of them have zero seeders at all. I don't know what even is the point. 29 of the results have one seeder. So al…

I always assume that the movie studios themselves hired some proxies to put out those 61gb files so as to waste everyone's time and bandwidth.

They are probably just ripped straight from a bluray without re-encoding.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#565

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Private ones that are invite only, like PTP, BTN, RED, Bib, etc.—the public tracker community really pales in comparison.

so... unless you can send us invites, your suggestions are not really useful to us

The top tier ones are hard to get into, but plenty of good ones open up from time to time for signups, e.g. TorrentLeech is open now: https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenSignups/comments/13wwg7w/torren...

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#567
post #105
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When did TPB get shut down? I somehow missed that piece of news

It didn't. Even the classic .org domain still works. However it is blocked by some ISPs, which may lead some people to think it has been shut down.

It is not the same website.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#568

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's very possible to run such without being exposed, but it involves patience and enough cash. Most of the time, these services aren't done in direct exchange for money or from people who have a lot of money in the first place. So what ends up happening is even if they can avoid the shallow legal issues by remaining private, they then run into the problem that nobody can pay for the service (not many options for pro…

Also: ad companies and payment processors are a weak link. They can provide de-anonymizing information to officials and cut off payments when their corporate values shift.

> ad companies and payment processors [...] cut off payments when their corporate values shift.

"Sir, is it time for us to claim to have corporate values?"

"Not yet, m'boy, we are still swimming in our private ocean of profits!"

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#570
post #515

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google will only remove specific URLs, not entire sites/domains. Even if every copyright holder with content on TPB sent a DMCA notice to Google today, new torrents -- at new URLs -- would pop up tomorrow.

Hmm i guess torrent sites can also counter by just not having static URLs for content?

Or by having lots and lots of duplicate static URLs (but only revealing them one by one).
Post reply on HN