Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Plus

openai.com

561–570 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#561
post #504

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't mind paying for AI services, but I want it to be transparent. I want to see the source code, the training data and so on. What I'm paying for should be the massive compute infrastructure needed to train and maintain the model, but something like this is way too important and powerful to be a 'blackbox' SAAS product. If we think we have problems with Facebook or Google's hold over us, this has the potential to…

StabilityAI's solution to provide base models everyone can fine-tune seems more useful. APIs are too restrictive and expensive.

Exactly. I see this being eclipsed by the Stable Diffusion equivalent for ChatGPT. You could then have cloud providers offering whatever specialised compute you need to easily run one of these as a server. Host your own instance in other words.

Obviously a lot of people will just want a simple SAAS product still, we won't want or need everyone, hosting their own apps (too energy intensive for a start). This can then be a SAAS offering, but backed by the same open source software.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#562

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People are seriously in denial about how powerful this is. As you said this is just the beginning

It's difficult to get someone to understand something when their salary depends upon not understanding it. HN loves to quote this, but when the dung hits the propeller, many can't see that they are just as expendable as anyone else.

I kinda like it honestly. Programmers have been so high on the hog, earning doctors salaries and thinking they are this special class of people where their jobs are totally unassailable. I know many who were earning 200k and have nearly no savings.

I don't think this will eliminate all jobs in the short term but it's going to have an impact very quickly. Hope these people are saving up

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#563

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uhh have you used it? It's pretty close. Its not always correct but neither are humans.its generally pretty correct and extremely fast.

> Uhh have you used it? Yes. > It's pretty close. No, its not, even in its narrow domain, whose narrowness by itself demonstrates its not anything like a near-human-level intelligence. > Its not always correct but neither are humans. Its a very good text generator, and is very useful. Its nothing even similar to a human-level intelligence.

I think it's actually very close to a human, and is already better than a lot of developers I've worked with. Many are mailing it in producing 20-30 lines of code a week. This will absolutely destroy the low end. Now one JR developer can massively eclipse them.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#565

Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.

Won't happen, putting aside possible disturbing/racists/etc content. The last thing OpenAI wants is that MSM wrote in mid 2025 that Russian/Iran/Chinese agents used ChatGPT to spread meticulous disinfo during 2024 election that either helped Trump win or agitate more Trumpists that 2024 is yet another stolen election bigly.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#566
post #451

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He's a programmer. They re cheaper than scrooge. They'll write a tool themselves in 6 months rather than spend 10 dollars. Idk why but programmers are the cheapest people on earth in regards to programming tools. I bought Intellij idea for $400 like 12 years ago and got made fun of at work even though it made me substantially faster than eclipse.

I’m paying about €200/year for Jetbrains Toolbox. This gives me a set of IDEs, one of which I’m using daily. And that’s less money than ChatGPT is asking.

Yeah but JetBrains isn't writing your code for you. This is a whole other level of technology that you cannot compare to something that exists already.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#567
post #374

~~~ To the ChatGPT Team ~~~ I'm currently receiving answers FROM OTHER USERS with this new version from 30 Jan, completely unrelated to my question: Q: Why is it easier for me to do endurance training on an empty stomach? A1: There are several things you can do to reduce the chance of getting a yeast infection: regenerate response: A2: There are many benefits to using cloud storage solutions such as Google Drive, Dro…

(I work at OpenAI.) Thanks for the report — these are not actually messages from other users, but instead the model generating something ~random due to hitting a bug on our backend where, rather than submitting your question, we submitted an empty query to the model. That's why you see just the answers and no question upon refresh — the question has been effectively dropped for this request. Team is fixing the issue…

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#568

Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.

> Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters?

Maybe not from OpenAI (though maybe when they have official API access, it will have options), but lots of people are active in this field, including open source offerings, so definitely, yes, even if maybe not as a packaged SaaS.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#570
post #374

~~~ To the ChatGPT Team ~~~ I'm currently receiving answers FROM OTHER USERS with this new version from 30 Jan, completely unrelated to my question: Q: Why is it easier for me to do endurance training on an empty stomach? A1: There are several things you can do to reduce the chance of getting a yeast infection: regenerate response: A2: There are many benefits to using cloud storage solutions such as Google Drive, Dro…

(I work at OpenAI.) Thanks for the report — these are not actually messages from other users, but instead the model generating something ~random due to hitting a bug on our backend where, rather than submitting your question, we submitted an empty query to the model. That's why you see just the answers and no question upon refresh — the question has been effectively dropped for this request. Team is fixing the issue…

[flagged]
Post reply on HN