Live data from Hacker News

The Mac Pro Lives

daringfireball.net

561–570 of 821 posts

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But why is it that the PowerShell terminal emulator is (graphically) even worse than a tty ? I've worked on ttys more agreeable on the eyes than Windows terminal emulators. Windows is supposed to have better font support than Linux. Also, if someone here has an answer: Why in the design of Windows aren't programs installed or symlinked in the PATH by default? I guess that was a design choice somewhere along the histo…

> Why in the design of Windows aren't programs installed or symlinked in the PATH by default? I guess that was a design choice somewhere along the history of Windows/DOS. Is there a reason? Windows' way of program executable placement is using the holy Registry. It's called 'Application Registration'[1] and was introduced to reduce the needs to modify the system-wide PATH variable. (They thought it was a bad idea to…

Hm, interesting. I suppose this is what http://scoop.sh should be using? (The per-user setting, "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths").

Oddly it appears the python2.7 installer uses this (global setting), but not the python3.x one (It would seem that python2 could register python.exe (as it currently does), and python3 could register python3.exe (as it currently does not)).

It certainly doesn't seem to make much sense for python3 to have an option to add itself to the path environment variable, and an option to change the path length limit - but apparently not an option to use this "modern" way of registering itself? (Unless, python2 and python3 installers, when fighting it out, default to only registering python2... which makes sense, but is painful).

But based on a windows hyper-v vm with only python3 installed, it looks like python3 does not use this setting.

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#562
post #322

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My only vim customization is `:imap kj `. Takes 10s to write into a .vimrc on any new computer.

Just use ctrl-c, no configuration necessary

It is important to note that they aren't identical:

http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/53633/does-using-ctr...

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#563
post #178

Am I the only one that sees OS X as the biggest reason to switch to Mac? I mean Windows is good, but nowhere good as OS X. And please, don't tell me Ubuntu or other linux flavors. They look good (and are good if you are programming on them) but the UX is still lacking a lot. (Never mind the confusion of the different flavors, packaging systems, and configurations). Also god forbid you have a problem (especially a har…

>Here are things that I'd pay $1,000 on top of the current Macbook Pro model: >- Thiner/Lighter >- Longer Battery Life (5+ hours) >- 32/64GB RAM These goals are diametrically opposed.

The first two points are, but not really the RAM. It's going to be an ounce at most. If they go from two 8GB sticks to two 16GB sticks, it wouldn't change size/weight at all.

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#564
post #355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Especially since the whole virtual escape key thing– being a default layout vim user for 20+ years I really don't understand how there can be vim users that haven't remapped escape. Like, if you care about ergonomics enough to complain about making a rarely used key into a touch key, how can you not care enough to remap that key if you use it more often? And Mac OS even has built-in support to remap caps-lock to es…

I've been using the escape key for vim since I started work as a programmer 21 years ago. That's a long time and I really don't want to change it. I know it might seem silly to you, but I'd switch to Linux on an XPS before I'd upgrade to a Mac with no escape key. (Not that I have to, plenty of Macs available without the touchbar)

FWIW, I've been using the touchbar MBP for ~6 months now and I haven't had any issues hitting ESC. It definitely feels different, but it works just fine. If anything my problem is that I hit ESC too easily now. I used to rest my hand above the ESC key when web browsing but that translated to resting it above tilde on the keyboard, which meant touching the ESC area. I've had to train myself to not do this.

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#565
post #355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Especially since the whole virtual escape key thing– being a default layout vim user for 20+ years I really don't understand how there can be vim users that haven't remapped escape. Like, if you care about ergonomics enough to complain about making a rarely used key into a touch key, how can you not care enough to remap that key if you use it more often? And Mac OS even has built-in support to remap caps-lock to es…

Some of us have been using vi/vim since before it was even possible to remap keys on our computing devices...

That is impressive. Since before xmodmap on a device that didn't either have ctrl-key positioned so that "^]" was easier, or had the esc key closer to home row?

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#566
post #340
post #335

Earlier quoted context omitted.

BetterTouchTool / BetterSnapTool

Seconded. I use + love BetterSnapTool. Works great.

Best tool ever. The custom touchpad gestures are great, too. You can do stuff like three-finger swipe up/down to switch to previous/next tab, and rotate right/left to open/close taps.

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#567
post #272

The current Mac Pro, as we’ve said a few times, was constrained thermally and it restricted our ability to upgrade it. So, when creating the 2013 Mac Pro, they knew they had to make a choice: either an upgradable system or a thermally constrained one that might look cool on the desk. What kind of market research suggested that Mac Pro customers wanted the latter? Or were they expecting to capture some new kind of pro…

> So, when creating the 2013 Mac Pro, they knew they had to make a choice: either an upgradable system or a thermally constrained one that might look cool on the desk.

No, that's not what they said at all. They said the choice they made was dual GPUs because they thought that was the road everyone was going to take. That turned out to be incorrect and the cylinder suffered because of that decision. They weren't talking about field upgradability.

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#568
So, they'll have a decent pro desktop available in more than a year. Do they seriously expect anyone to wait for them after years of silence?

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#569
post #318

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My number one complaint about OSX is also window management. I've never found anything comparable to the way Windows 7 let you use the left/right arrows to line up windows on half the screen. That is the only thing I miss about Windows, but it's a pretty big one. Also, when dis/connecting monitors on OSX, windows often get lost. ps- if anyone has any suggestions or recommendations, I'd love to hear them!

Not sure what specifically you're talking about here, but if you wanna line up two windows side-by-side you can long click on the green "full screen" traffic light button in the top left of an app's window (e.g. Word), and choose which half of the screen you want it to maximise in. Then do the same for another running app in the other half and it'll split the screen between two apps at full size.

TIL! Great feature. After you have your two side by side apps you can also drag the border in between to make one larger than the other.

Re: The Mac Pro Lives

#570
post #178

Am I the only one that sees OS X as the biggest reason to switch to Mac? I mean Windows is good, but nowhere good as OS X. And please, don't tell me Ubuntu or other linux flavors. They look good (and are good if you are programming on them) but the UX is still lacking a lot. (Never mind the confusion of the different flavors, packaging systems, and configurations). Also god forbid you have a problem (especially a har…

Isn't the article about the Mac Pro, not the Macbook Pro?
Post reply on HN