Live data from Hacker News

US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

notebookcheck.net

551–560 of 560 posts

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#551

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't work if you don't have 1:1 product, which Intel foundry absolutely doesn't. Not in performance, price or just ease of use. No one is going to risk years and billions to get it working on Intel, that's a sure way to lose your edge. Companies (like Nvidia) will just raise prices and if demand drops they will divert more of it to countries like China and EU. And demand isn't going to drop much anyway for in-d…

Monopolists or companies with some degree of Monopoly will absorb some of the tariffs as opposed to passing on. Putting tariffs on monopolists makes some economic sense. Tariffs on commodities though don't.

Monopolies with strong demand for their products will happily pass on the costs, and then some. The delicate balance between encouraging demand while maintaining margins.

On the political side of things, they can use their influence and customer base to pressure the government. Silently eating the costs isn't good for them or the market as a whole, long-term.

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#552
post #416

This is just pure extortion and it's across the globe. It'll just drive more countries towards BRICS.

i mean what do you call the US domineering nearly the entire world's trade with its massive military for the past nearly 100 years?

True. At least Trump has exposed it.

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#553
post #542

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for the insights! Obviously I am economy noob. > US has famously high drug prices due so cutting edge pharma makes much of its profits there That's still weird to me. Switzerland has a cutting edge pharma market too and health care is affordable.

Too many reasons for a reply here, but overall the common theme is lack of regulation giving pharma more power to play on their patent-derived monopolies. As for Switzerland, it's a small country with an economic model that doesn't scale/generalize. Even in Switzerland there's constant discussion about health care (insurance) being too expensive - though the biggest driver is wages not drug prices.

I am not sure if you read other news but I am not aware of constant discussions when our insurance is comparingly cheaper than for example Austria but we earn 3 times as much.

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#554

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You got some wildly incomplete facts. https://fortune.com/2023/06/03/tsmc-arizona-plant-jobs-salar... >New engineering grads with a master’s degree earn on average $65,700 a year, while general full-time staff earn $32,800—compared to Taiwan’s average annual income of $21,700. $32.8k for full time salaries in Taiwan, which is more than the average. And this is _general_ staff. Not engineering staff my dude. >Another…

My friends working in fabrication - experienced, competent engineers with years of work history in Intel and Micron factories - got laughably insultingly low offers from TSMC. Like, 50k, no PTO, weak or no benefits. They literally laughed the offers away and got cushy software jobs with minimal retraining. This was a few years back, maybe TSMC realized you can't pay Taiwan rates in the US.

They obviously changed things given the article lol

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#555
post #395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s not as simple as just buying an ASML machine and make chips. Otherwise Intel would have already done that. For the cutting edge stuff TSMC is a monopoly.

TSMC certainly brings a lot to the table but if they were completely knocked out, it would just deprive the world of the top end of fab capacity for a while. On the other hand almost every fab in the world depends on ASML for parts and maintenance, even the old fabs on legacy nodes.

But most of those other fabs are in China! How does that help the US?

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#556

Earlier quoted context omitted.

TSMC tried to build fabs in US, it doesn’t work, turns out you can’t hire top PhDs and pay them 30k and tell them it’s a lot of money

doesn't tsmc have a 4nm plant in arizona that is cranking out chips today?

No? Show me a GPU, or a CPU, or anything with a Made in America label.

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#557

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My friends working in fabrication - experienced, competent engineers with years of work history in Intel and Micron factories - got laughably insultingly low offers from TSMC. Like, 50k, no PTO, weak or no benefits. They literally laughed the offers away and got cushy software jobs with minimal retraining. This was a few years back, maybe TSMC realized you can't pay Taiwan rates in the US.

They obviously changed things given the article lol

I've learned not to trust articles' accuracy on aspects not corporations that are difficult to verify in public data.

Once I was reading an article saying the company I worked for didn't operate its own datacenters... while I was setting up new hardware in one of our several datacenters.

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#558

Tariffs kinda make sense when you have a deficit in a widely available item. Big trade deficit with Bangladesh? Sure you can buy cheap textiles from Thailand or Vietnam or something. Unfortunately this approach does not work when you lack a viable domestic alternative and you're up against a monopoly. What will the US do if TSMC does not blink? Not buy TSMC made chips? Obviously that is impossible, so the logical con…

> Tariffs kinda make sense when you have a deficit in a widely available item. Big trade deficit with Bangladesh? Sure you can buy cheap textiles from Thailand or Vietnam or something.

What exactly does this acomplish?

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#559

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It has nothing to do with stupidity. Stop painting people as idiots because they exist in one of the most information hostile environments in human history. This isn't some natural state that's unrecoverable. The people you describe have been given a highly addictive media environment tailor made to engender outrage and drive behavior. It shouldn't be a shock when most people cannot resist it. The first step to chang…

> The people you describe have been given a highly addictive media environment tailor made to engender outrage and drive behavior. It shouldn't be a shock when most people cannot resist it. Although I also take issue with labeling people "stupid," I also take issue with the blanket assumption that people are victims of the media environment. Both take away people's agency in their own way. Instead, I'll ask this unco…

Tough spot when every feed is engineered for outrage, but it also feels too easy to say folks have no choice in what they lean into. You could try Loyally ai to think about it like habits and rewards, small nudges change what we return to. Over time that can shift preferences toward stuff that holds up, not just what feels good in the moment.

Re: US reportedly forcing TSMC to buy 49% stake in Intel to secure tariff relief

#560

Tariffs kinda make sense when you have a deficit in a widely available item. Big trade deficit with Bangladesh? Sure you can buy cheap textiles from Thailand or Vietnam or something. Unfortunately this approach does not work when you lack a viable domestic alternative and you're up against a monopoly. What will the US do if TSMC does not blink? Not buy TSMC made chips? Obviously that is impossible, so the logical con…

> What will the US do if TSMC does not blink? Not buy TSMC made chips?

Yes.

> Obviously that is impossible

I assume you're willing to short Intel at this point?

Post reply on HN