Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This whole article is talking about absentee fathers, but every example is listing why the mother left or kicked out the father. Because the article takes the very rational and supported by the article side that these mothers were actually founded in kicking them out. > The article also simply takes for granted that it's a bad thing that these nuclear families do not stay together. No, the article goes much further…
> It points out that upper-class and middle-class people like to pretend and promote that the nuclear family doesn't matter while themselves acting like it does. Rich people say you don't need a yacht. Yet, rich people buy yachts. Clearly yachts are very important for becoming and staying rich, and the wealthy are undermining the poor with their "yachts are a luxury" posturing. It is to be expected that people encoun…
Not having a yacht is not like “having a worse yacht by xyz criteria”, hence that comparison just does not work. There is always a family.
I personally agree with the parent here, it might be helpful to read the article again.