Live data from Hacker News

Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

twitter.com

551–560 of 579 posts

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#551
post #548

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have some general advice for you - please assume that people argue in good faith.

I didn't think you weren't arguing in good faith. I still don't think you weren't arguing in good faith. That's why I was explaining some important extra context to you that you seemed to be unaware of.

It seems that I've misinterpreted the intent of your comment. I apologize for the accusation.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#552
post #548

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't think you weren't arguing in good faith. I still don't think you weren't arguing in good faith. That's why I was explaining some important extra context to you that you seemed to be unaware of.

It seems that I've misinterpreted the intent of your comment. I apologize for the accusation.

No worries. I'm sorry I wrote something so unclearly that you felt I was attacking you. It wasn't my intent.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#553

You'd think a non-white non-American female engineer not afraid of self-expression and her own sexuality would be a darling given the big talk of diversity and inclusion, but in the end she gets rejected because her boobs are too big for America to handle. It's comical.

Quoted post unavailable.

You can't post like this to HN. Since it looks like you've been using HN primarily for ideological battle, I've banned this account. For explanations of why we do that, see these links:

https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#554
post #514

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you have the skills, it generally shouldn't matter what clothes you wear. Even if you don't have the skills, it generally shouldn't matter what clothes you wear. Like don't strap knives to your arms, and do wear a good mask, but generally we spend a lot of time policing other folk's bodies and attire, and for what?

Agree.. As long as my dick isnt hanging out of my shorts Im generally good to go. (Helps my customers are pretty laid back too)

I worked for two gay guys that had their office in a flat next to their home. Sometimes they'd forget which side of the partition they were on. In the beginning I was a bit flushed about this, after a while I didn't even notice any more.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#555

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't really support to ban anything that could be seen as sexual, but if you put it out, some people will always judge you on that merit. It will also net you attention and can overshadow your other feats. Should she be condemned for that? I don't think so. But the engineering feats alone will never be the focus as a consequence.

>But the engineering feats alone will never be the focus as a consequence. There's a line between "never be the focus" and "we will erase you". This sort of thing is constant- but I'll give you a recent example- NPR recently ran this story: https://www.npr.org/2021/10/25/1047691984/decades-after-poli... About an American lady who needed some parts for her iron lung and how no one would help her. Only the thing is, th…

Never change. What you do is wonderful.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#556
post #498

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Her appearance is part of her (sexual) identity: https://twitter.com/realsexycyborg/status/139660540781712998... Of course, she could hide it, but she just doesn't want to.

Wow, that thread. Sexual identities have become very complicated.

I suspect they always were. Society just had an easier time pretending that they were not.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#557
post #297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

USA. that's why.

Except it's not an USA thing. Here in Europe showing nipples in a public place is also considered nudity and generally frowned upon. It's a cultural thing, no need to attribute ideology to it. And the culture is shifting - just a century ago it was considered not modest if you wore shorts or short skirts, or two-piece swimsuits, now it's normal and accepted.

You really should avoid Budapest then.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#558

Wu has done more for the Maker subculture than almost any of her critics. Details have been well documented in other posts. I wish Wu's critics would just be honest for once. I try not to be reductive, but I her case it's patently obvious that she gets flack because she's got extremely big tits. Given the boxes she checks (female, clearly very intelligent, creative, STEM stuff, good content creator) she'd be held up…

At a guess it is simply jealousy. They know that she has done more than they will ever do for the maker subculture and that she will do a whole lot more. To make themselves seem a bit taller they have to kick the other person down.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#559

I totally support being able to express yourself. All power to Wu, but I could not care less about this channel. It feels very misplaced and fake. Feels like going half naked to a childrens party.

I'm aware it's incongruous. The whole thing makes very sensible people uncomfortable because it seems vulgar and unnecessary. And that's going to be the case until I butch up and use my words. Probably won't help much, but it might at least make some sense then.

I don't think you owe anybody an explanation, especially not when pressured for one.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#560

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It depends maybe on the circles you interact with, but in some circles, people are not taken seriously which try too much to adhere to the conservative business dress code by wearing a suite with tie. This is actually a common meme: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/fbwnd0/im_... https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/ajthjb/thi... https://www.quora.com/What-do-people-think-good-programmers…

Right leaning software developer here. What are you talking about? Why do you think this has anything to do with political alignment? I find a suit as uncomfortable as anybody else. Dress code is more about public image in my experience than political alignment.

The use of "conservative" here doesn't seem to refer to political alignment. It is common to talk about "conservative business culture" and "conservative dress" to refer to cultural factors — exactly around things like expecting suits and ties. The parent post does not appear to be talking about politics.
Post reply on HN