Live data from Hacker News

American Equity

blog.samaltman.com

551–552 of 552 posts

Re: American Equity

#551

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It can't increase rent. Rent are capped by what tenants can pay, they are specifically set to "as much as the tenants can afford" because everyone needs a roof. Taxing the landlord doesn't give more moneys to the tenant. However, what could happen is that the rental income after tax is lower and not enough anymore to cover the mortgage or the maintenance costs, then the property has to be sold.

When that property is sold, from whom will the displaced tenant now rent? Market rents are set by supply and demand, just like most goods. More supply of rental property? Rents go down so that landlords aren't stuck with vacancies. More demand for rental property? Rents go up so landlords can maximize their profits.

From the new landlord who bought the place, supposing they didn't buy to occupy it themselves.

FYI: Selling a property doesn't take it off the market. It's just owned by a new owner, who's gonna either live in or rent it just like before.

Re: American Equity

#552

> I’d like feedback on the following idea. > I think that every adult US citizen should get an annual share of the US GDP. Sure thing, sama. I hope you saw it[1]: https://medium.com/@simon.sarris/after-universal-basic-incom... Without addressing these issues, UBI could look like a nightmare even if we're all on board. I think he's committing the usual assumptions: 1. That what people struggling and suffering in the U…

There's lots of food for thought in your essay. There are aspects of UBI that appeal deeply to me, since I could happily spend the rest of my life reading, making music, and writing software that scratches my own itches, and I've never been very status conscious. If I think about it, most vocal UBI proponents I've been exposed to probably have a similar personality, but as you say, it's not clear that the long tail of the population operates this way.
Post reply on HN