Live data from Hacker News

Tennessee man jailed 37 days for Trump meme wins settlement after lawsuit

fire.org

541–543 of 543 posts

Re: Tennessee man jailed 37 days for Trump meme wins settlement after lawsuit

#541

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. The US Civil Rights Act covered discrimination from business owners for example. And anyone could prevent you to vote or attempt coercion.

Elections are not private. I don't see how someone could stop me from voting. If they do that is just kidnapping, threats of violence, etc.

> Elections are not private.

Who said they were?

> I don't see how someone could stop me from voting. If they do that is just kidnapping, threats of violence, etc.

Section 131(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1957 states that “[n]o person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose” for any candidate for federal office.[1]

[1] https://journals.law.harvard.edu/crcl/what-is-voter-intimida...

Re: Tennessee man jailed 37 days for Trump meme wins settlement after lawsuit

#542

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Elections are not private. I don't see how someone could stop me from voting. If they do that is just kidnapping, threats of violence, etc.

> Elections are not private. Who said they were? > I don't see how someone could stop me from voting. If they do that is just kidnapping, threats of violence, etc. Section 131(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1957 states that “[n]o person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any other person for the purpose of interfering with…

right, and that shouldn't be prosecuted under it's own statue. Threats of violence should always be illegal

Re: Tennessee man jailed 37 days for Trump meme wins settlement after lawsuit

#543
post #299
post #294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You may want to explain a bit better, as stated it sounds like you’d prefer he’d still be in jail: “ See I don't view the guy getting out after 37 days as a success”

The case shouldn't have been brought, but even if brought he should have had a prompt bond hearing and been let out within 24 hours.

I do agree
Post reply on HN