Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

svd.se

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

541–550 of 870 posts

Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

#541

Post by notpushkin »

tomhow wrote: post #533
deaux wrote: post #525

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Terms like "hidden" and "see everything" are in a title are clickbait. The one containing "hidden" is the one you apparently changed it to originally - I don't think GP can, nor has any reason to - so you initially changed it to.. clickbait? It seems a serious reach to call "see everything" clickbait. > First-ever in-utero stem cell therapy for fetal spina bifida repair is safe, study finds Currently 9th on the fro…

Can we discuss the issue without being accusatory and interrogatory. The point of the guidelines (about titles and everything else) is so we can discuss things curiously, without getting riled up. OK I've looked in the logs and here's what happened. The originally submitted title was: The workers behind Meta’s smart glasses can see everything . That title was created by the submitter; it's not the original title and…

> and people's riled-up-ness will spill over to any perception that we're "suppressing" the story

It’s just a hot topic. The A hidden workforce one was way off, which is why people might have got that impression. I don’t think this was intentional, but I can understand where the backlash is coming from :)

Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

#542

Post by echelon »

duskdozer wrote: post #451
drawnwren wrote: post #371

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As much as this is a damning quote, it is perhaps also damning that any time someone wants to smear zuck they have to reach 20 years into the past.

There's a big difference between "someone said something stupid as a kid"... "but now has changed and is a totally different person" and "is doing the same things but now knows how not to say the quiet part out loud"

Exactly.

Show us how Meta is a moral player in society.

All I can see are lots of evil behaviors.

Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

#543

Post by boca_honey »

duskdozer wrote: post #491
boca_honey wrote: post #254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure if you have experience with teenagers, but you’ll quickly realize they are even more resistant to this technology than we ever were. For the vast majority of kids today, this is their worst nightmare. They will reject it even more forcefully than we have.

Really? The ones living on tiktok?

Don't be dense. They control what they upload to social media and they mostly do it within closed circles (close friends, etc). Being recorded without consent is another story.

Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

#544

Post by echelon »

greentea23 wrote: post #519
chwahoo wrote: post #271

I'll confess that I like my Meta Ray Ban glasses: I love using them to listen to podcasts at the pool/beach, while riding my bike, and it's cool to snap a quick picture of my kids without pulling out my phone. I wish this article (or Meta) were a bit clearer about the specific connection between the device settings and use and when humans get access to the images. My settings are: - [OFF] "Share additional data" - Sh…

I don't understand how a parent can be OK non-consenually uploading pictures of their children's real faces to an ad driven AI company famous for abusing people's data and manipulating children on their platforms.

I don't get how private businesses allow these. It's as creepy as Google Glass, yet we don't see the same pushback.

Is it because younger people don't care about privacy anymore?

Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

#545

Post by boca_honey »

xboxnolifes wrote: post #410
boca_honey wrote: post #254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure if you have experience with teenagers, but you’ll quickly realize they are even more resistant to this technology than we ever were. For the vast majority of kids today, this is their worst nightmare. They will reject it even more forcefully than we have.

The teenagers I know willing put geo-tracking software on their phones to see where their friends are at any time.

Yeah, and that's consensual. Being recorded by some creep with cringe VR glasses is nothing like that.

Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

#546

Post by [deleted] »

sershe wrote: post #263
pluc wrote: post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They better invest in frame designs too cause as soon as they're recognizable they're gonna get slapped off faces real quick

I'm not the kind of person to wear those, but if I was and someone tried to slap them off me I might feel really threatened if you catch my drift. And since I won't be able to see too well, it will take some extra effort... Was that remaining movement the next punch, or death throes? Can't see too well, better safe than sorry!

[deleted]

Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

#547

Post by lovich »

monero-xmr wrote: post #512
Dylan16807 wrote: post #495

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The big problem with checking IDs is not the checking, it's the people with the right to vote that don't have IDs. (and can't get one super easily) So with that noted, when people make false claims of high levels of voter fraud, to justify government intervention that disenfranchises people, that falls into the fascism bucket. And anyone that stays in favor of those actions despite these explanations gets to be in th…

[flagged]

I was at my local grocery store earlier this week. Bought a bunch of food, also got liquor at the local packy, didnt need ID for anything. So you are definitionally incorrect.

As to why people have a problem with demanding ID for voting, its because its not coupled with a requirement for the government to ensure every citizen has ID free of charge. Then you get shit like the current admin ordering places to stop providing identification services https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/nonprofit-libraries-or...

and it seems like the intent is to make sure that certain types of people cant vote. Not an intent to make sure only the people with the right to vote can vote.

If you combine a claim for voter ID along with an increase in spending to make sure every valid voter gets one free of charge, then I'd believe you were not being malicious and were actually concerned with voting integrity.

I dont think youd ever do that, so get fucked. Rescinded if you are willing to claim otherwise.

Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

#548

Post by whiplash451 »

chwahoo wrote: post #271

I'll confess that I like my Meta Ray Ban glasses: I love using them to listen to podcasts at the pool/beach, while riding my bike, and it's cool to snap a quick picture of my kids without pulling out my phone. I wish this article (or Meta) were a bit clearer about the specific connection between the device settings and use and when humans get access to the images. My settings are: - [OFF] "Share additional data" - Sh…

Your setting is off cloud media until the company arbitrarily turns it on for you. Seems crazy now, won’t be ten years from now. They’re just boiling the frog all the way.

Re: Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns

#550

Post by levanten »

chwahoo wrote: post #271

I'll confess that I like my Meta Ray Ban glasses: I love using them to listen to podcasts at the pool/beach, while riding my bike, and it's cool to snap a quick picture of my kids without pulling out my phone. I wish this article (or Meta) were a bit clearer about the specific connection between the device settings and use and when humans get access to the images. My settings are: - [OFF] "Share additional data" - Sh…

After all that has been revealed to us over the past 15 years, it is really disheartening to see people still thinking that setting a few toggles will prevent these companies from abusing them.

Just continues to prove that if you solve a bit of inconvenience for them, people will let you exploit them and their families.

Post reply on HN