Live data from Hacker News

Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

politico.com

541–550 of 1001 posts

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#541

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you know you have over 100m in assets? One never really knows the worth of something until it's sold. (i.e. try selling a used car. there's what you think it's worth and what you get...) And once the asset is sold, that's a taxable event.

Easy. Share price x number of shares.

Few things are easy. Some problems with your proposal:

1. Assumes the asset in question is publicly traded.

2. Assumes the publicly traded asset has a non trivial amount of trade volume 3. Assumes asset price is relatively stable, moving in a narrow band along a clear trend-line

4. Assumes you have defined the price from the stock information (last trade before close. Daily average, etc)

5. Assumes holder's position is small enough not to affect stock price were they to sell.

And stocks are the easiest to do this with!

Look at the Trump vs NY court case for the value of his house in FL. Unlike the valuation imposed by government fiat, the valuation was agreed to freely by the parties. The courts found it excessive (and it might be) and proposed a valuation so ridiculously low it alone gives Trump grounds to appeal that the judge is either incompetent on the matter or has a personal bias and should anyway have recused himself.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#542

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN allows everyone with sufficient karma to vouch for dead comments (or flag comments), I suspect most of the comment-level moderation you see is crowdsourced to fellow commenters; a still-dead comment means most of those who see choose to keep it dead. HN is awesome because of the rules and moderation (including bans); any unmoderated forum devolves into a cesspit; and it only takes a surprisingly few bad apples to…

The HN crowd like reddit leans massively progressive/democratic. As such any thinking outside normal or contrarian views are massively suppressed. Classic contrarian (to HN) around WFH, Capitalism, Elon Musk, Tesla, Regulation is downvoted and even flagged

HN crowd is democrat but not progressive. Reddit crowd is progressive

Also HN doesn't censor as much, libertarian-right posters that would've gotten downvoted to hell on reddit actually have an outlet here. Religious right has no outlet on either site

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#543

In 2020, the charity he and his wife run donated hundreds of millions of dollars to local US election offices to help cover extra costs related to the pandemic. Conservatives claim, without evidence of course, that those funds skewed election results toward Democratic Party candidates especially in battleground states like Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. All of Zuckerbergs earned media -- the "inside look" at his mixed m…

[deleted]

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#544
post #395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The funny thing about this thread is that I have no idea where the Trump starts and the Harris ends. I have learned nothing about anyone's political stances from this back and forth.

It's difficult to parse subsubzero's post after his edit, but he's saying Zuck believes Trump will win in 2024, so Zuck's spinning a narrative that he was forced to remove COVID misinformation, because COVID misinformation was largely a right-wing phenomenon.

My response to him was to point out that Harris is strong and trending stronger, while Trump is weak, so the tea leaves are saying the opposite of what he thinks they're saying.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#545
post #524

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There was some post about Israel the other day (might have been Google's relationship to Israel or something) where every comment about the war starting last year was highly visible, while every comment about what happened prior to last year was dead.

Those contentious threads never last long here for that reason. Reddit is 90% those sorts of heavily moderated comment threads where everyone agrees with each other and those who don't align get removed or downvoted. People can always just go there.

Comparison to Reddit: bogus.

Yes, HN is better than a toxic cesspit full of ignorant teenagers. That's a low hurdle.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#546
Hard to understand why Zuck would come out with this now? This is like a bazooka shot at Democrats ... to give Gym Jordan this information to twist and distort. Never mind that the "censored" data turned out to be from Russian operative sources ... yes, never mind that.

This seems bigger than just business, or the House Judiciary Committee. Is this about Israel and fear of what a Harris admin would do (or stop doing)? Either way, there is definitely underhanded intent in this "admission" from ole'Zuck IMO.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#547

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agree, Zuck has zero integrity and I think he sees the tea leaves in where things are headed in November and is trying to say he was bullied into making alot of disastrous decisions that he and he only ordered for an administration/party that he personally donated $400M+ to.

>he sees the tea leaves in where things are headed in November Things are headed strongly in the opposite direction you're implying.

[deleted]

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#548

It's funny because Facebook's news feed in the last couple years is unusable, filled with AI slop and clickbait. Twitter similarly requires aggressive use of block + mute to eliminate scams, clickbait, and other content I'm not interested in. I don't know if this is due to their changes in moderation policy, or if AI has overwhelmed them, but I vastly preferred the old news feeds

For some reason twitter thinks I want to read/watch star wars talking heads talk about how great star wars is and it's obviously the greatest it's ever been. Tbh I don't care about star wars but no amount of blocking or muting seems to end the amount of star wars content that Twitter thrusts in my face.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#549
post #503

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After being fed up with political ragebait I deleted my facebook account, and created a new one where I have no friends, and make no posts, and only "friends of friends" (i.e. nobody) can friend request me. I have a fake name, and a blank image for an avatar. There is no feed, but I can still join discussion groups related to my interests, and use the marketplace to buy and sell. Overall, it is a pretty good experien…

I admin two FB groups, and a lot of people in those groups now know me which makes it a lot harder. They are the main reason I am still on FB. Occasional posts from friends, and I do post (three psots this mont, and that is pretty typical)

People in the groups I'm in also know me in real life and know who I am, but cannot send me a friend request, so they don't. It works fine.
Post reply on HN