Live data from Hacker News

Raspberry Pi 5

raspberrypi.com

541–550 of 1001 posts

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#541
post #524
post #483

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you about dev boards but I think their post was focused on things like used NUCs or other small x86 machines that are only marginally larger than a Pi in an enclosure and include literally everything you'd want (enclosure, pwa fan, SATA SSD, NVMe, wifi, etc.) and the software support is there (linux / windows).

How about power consumption, especially in when not under load? I remember that Intel chips were not as efficient at it as chips with ARM cores.

Good point, I am not sure they can compete with the smaller arm development boards in that regard!

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#542

Surprised by the amount of negativity here. So many comments that are saying the raspberry pi isn't competitive in their market anymore and then post more locked down less open systems at 2x the price.

Seriously dude, why would you even want a new aarch64 SBC when you could buy a used NUC off ebay or just use a laptop you pulled out of a dumpster?

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#543

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would active cooling work underneath another hat?

It looks like the M2 socket will be connected with a flexible ribbon, so it is possible that it could be mounted below.

I'd welcome an M.2 shoe rather than a hat.

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#544

Hey, I'm not really savvy with hardware. I wanted to use a pi4 to be my home TV controller to stream content to a TV or projector. A long time ago I saw this appear: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495719 And it seemed to sort of work but not quite enough. There were stutters in the content streamed and strange clicks in the audio. Will this new one be enough? Was that even the likely limiting factor?

In my experience my Raspberry Pi 3, running Kodi, was able to keep up with a 720p MPEG2 stream as long as I had no network hiccups.

Not sure what file format your Raspberry Pi is trying to transcode from though.

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#545

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All I want is UEFI so we can stop having per-device images. Is that so much to ask?

The master CPU of the Rasberry Pi 1-4 is the VideoCore GPU, not the Arm. The "firmware" is the now-Microsoft-owned, proprietary, ThreadX RTOS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThreadX The Arm doesn't start the computer and you can't run any firmware on the Arm that will change this.

There's no reason the GPU can't chain boot a UEFI implementation on a few MB of onboard flash, though

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#546
post #415

Question to the raspberry enthusiasts: Does anyone know if I can reliably extend a Raspberry Pi with an additional Gbit Ethernet port?

With a USB 3.0 port and a USB-to-Ethernet adapter you should be able to. Not all adapters support 1 Gbps but with USB 3.0 it's definitely possible.

I'm getting close to line speed with a USB 3.0 Ethernet adapter plugged into a laptop, so the adapter itself shouldn't be the bottleneck. I get 109KB/s ftp transfers to a NVMe drive.

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#547

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All I want is UEFI so we can stop having per-device images. Is that so much to ask?

rPI went from armv6 to armv7 to armv8. CortexA76 does not even support using 32 bit kernels. Rp1 requires an armv6 32 bit kernel. There is NO kernel build on earth that would run on both an pi1 and a pi5 and no amount of efi would help. (I am ignoring the possibility of custom nasty hacks to make a polyglot kernel). We’ll have per-device images until we standardize on a single architecture or at least a subset of one…

Yeah, I can live with images per architecture; the problem is needing an image specifically for the pi. I want the same thing as we get on x86; sure, there are separate images for i686 and x86_64, but there's not one image for Dell and one for HP and one for Lenovo and...

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#548
A number of vendors seem to only be showing 4GB and 8GB units for $60 and $80, but https://vilros.com/collections/raspberry-pi-5/products/raspb... has 1GB and 2GB variants for $40 and $50 respectively.

https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-5/ says "LPDDR4X-4267 SDRAM (4GB and 8GB SKUs available at launch)" so maybe the cheaper ones will be coming at a later date?

Unrelated to that, the addition of a power button seems like a significant improvement over previous models.

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#549

Surprised by the amount of negativity here. So many comments that are saying the raspberry pi isn't competitive in their market anymore and then post more locked down less open systems at 2x the price.

I mean, keep in mind that the Pi5 is a $60 device with ~$60+ of support hardware (Power supply, cable, miniHDMI to HDMI, Cooling, Case, Storage) You can get considerably more powerful mini PCs for less than a 4GB Pi5 with needed accessories that is upgradable, has further software support, and includes all of what you need to get with a Pi. Also, you are reducing eWaste.

The starter kits which include all that stuff have been about 150% of the price of the bare board for older models.

Re: Raspberry Pi 5

#550

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you read the blog post? :) "Raspberry Pi 5 consumes significantly less power, and runs significantly cooler, than Raspberry Pi 4 when running an identical workload. However, the much higher performance ceiling means that for the most intensive workloads, and in particular for pathological “power virus” workloads, peak power consumption increases to around 12W, versus 8W for Raspberry Pi 4."

Alright so 27W with heavy peripheral draw then? But 12 W still means it'll be drawing 2.4 amps instead of 1.6 when a random process decides to 100% it. I guess we can always underclock it. The real unanswered question is, does it finally have a damn sleep mode so it can save power when idle.

> The real unanswered question is, does it finally have a damn sleep mode so it can save power when idle.

I dream of DIY'ing a laptop, and RPi looks like a great platform for prototyping that... until you realize there's just no sensible way to put it to sleep. Hibernate + aggressive boot time optimization?

Post reply on HN