Musk commented on this: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1674865731136020505 "Temporary emergency measure. We were getting data pillaged so much that it was degrading service for normal users!"
"Several hundred organizations (maybe more) were scraping Twitter data extremely aggressively, to the point where it was affecting the real user experience. What should we do to stop that? I’m open to ideas." https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1674898695534309378 "1. Scraping is already disallowed by T&C. 2. The scraping orgs dgaf & mask their IPs through proxy servers or through orgs that appear legit. For example,…
Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
541–550 of 1001 posts
Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
#542Earlier quoted context omitted.
The answer would seem to be POSSE - Publish on your Own Site, Syndicate Everywhere https://indieweb.org/POSSE
How does this help to fix the essentially non-technical problem that on long enough time horizons, and by long enough maybe 5 years at most these days, content that is optimized to provoke reaction ("engagement") outcompetes content that is optimized to promote contemplation, on any network, whether syndicated or not.
Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
#543Uggh. I only use twitter to follow critical (life-and-death) emergency broadcasts from our local fire department. Is there a viable alternative for them to use now that twitter is going to block most of our county’s residents?
If the local authorities have an actual life-and-death emergency broadcast to make to the entire area they serve, I suspect they have a more effective means to do this than Twitter. As a matter of public safety, they need to be able to inform everyone, whether they've subscribed or not, and in a way that does not require users to think to check for a notification, or even to have a special device (like a cellphone to…
Youre not wrong, but that doesn't mean they make effective use of them. During one of Canada's deadliest mass shootings, the police elected to only post information on Twitter.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/rcmp-twitter-aler...
Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
#544Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
#545It always irked me that public institutions embraced Twitter as a primary means of communication in many cases. It never seemed right that a private company was being put in between public functions and the the public which depends on them. Not to mention, since I live outside the US, a private company in another country. I even wrote complaints to one local public body to ask them to set up a communication channel t…
Unfortunately, we are living in a world where using private company's social media is the most effective way to communicate public announcement as lots of people are using it daily. I am not sure if people are going to install government social media app just to receive information pertaining to public matters.
You'd need to convince people to side-load an app from a government website, or install a government app store.
Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
#546It's funny that creating a twitter clone has been a "hello world" kind of project for most web frameworks over the last 10 years but here we are without any feature-complete alternatives.
Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
#547Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean... for decades, the public institutions instead relied on private TV networks to do all of their communications. And propaganda. And they still do. How is Twitter any different than FOX News or CNN?
They weren't "private" TV networks. They are licensed by the government to use our airwaves, which are accessible by all (except CNN, which is cable). There's a big difference. Governmental and public institutions should not be relying on Twitter for their communications. It's unprofessional at the very least.
You wouldn't put quotes around that word for cell-phone companies using licensed bandwidth, or airlines using public airspace, would you?
Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
#548Earlier quoted context omitted.
The article itself is well over 6 hours old. While you may technically be correct about the fact that Musk's tweet counts as comment, an article that has yet to be updated should be called "now inaccurate", not "fake news". The way you've misrepresented this is more akin to fake news than the article is, and likely to get your comment flagged/heavily downvoted.
> an article that has yet to be updated should be called "now inaccurate", not "fake news". I disagree. It's a lie by omission, as same-day corrections on articles are a journalistic norm. By not doing so here, it conveniently furthers the Anti-Elon agenda that the tech media, including Techcrunch, has been confirmed to be pushing. Means, motive, opportunity. There is a huge ethics problem with "journalists" in the U…
Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
#549Earlier quoted context omitted.
Every public school and government institution for at least the last two decades has depended on private SaaS companies for everything from recording grades, to managing school lunches, payroll, attendance and almost every other facet of education
It does beg the question why the public sector doesn't aim to create a public source software division for all of these administrative needs. Jobs program and all that.
I wish, the US government, was like that full of decisive, well intentioned, intelligent boot strapped innovators but the motiff of government projects are things like:
One bathroom stall at build costing millions and years behind schedule
City trash bins costing hundreds of thousands
Airplane trash bins costing tens of thousands
And the list certainly Curtis go on those are just the recent ones I’ve read about.
I’m watching a government software replacement worth tens of billions and seeing the attempt to integrate is painful. They sure aren’t agile.
I don’t work in tech.
Re: Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
#550Earlier quoted context omitted.
It never seemed right that a private company was being put in between public functions and the the public which depends on them. But why? It’s always been that way. Before Twitter, it was private radio stations, private TV stations or private newspapers.
Radio stations & TV stations use public airwaves and actually (used to, not sure now) had to prove they were acting in the public interest to keep their licenses. Doing public announcements were one way they handled that function.
In the end it’s still private companies (with the exception of public broadcasters or websites).