Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your argument is that my brain is more energy-efficient than ChatGPT, therefore... ChatGPT is incapable of "understanding"?
I’m not arguing that it is more energy efficient. I’m showing the obvious fact that there is a massive scale difference in the amount of energy and that one is capable of much more complex problem solving which seems to indicate that the two things are fundamentally different.
CheatGPT
541–544 of 544 posts
Okay. Same question I asked elsewhere in this thread; care to make a prediction about a problem that won't ever get solved by an LLM? We know they can write essays, create art, write code — what's something they'll never do?
Re: CheatGPT
#542Cheating in academia isn't a problem, because the only people students are cheating is themselves. I've seen plenty of cheaters, they were the worst students, and despite cheating couldn't graduate or couldn't find a job after graduating. If some moron is stupid enough to cheat when he's paying 50K a year, let them.
The problem with widespread cheating even if you don't cheat yourself is it essentially reduces the credit rating of your $50k program and has knock on effects elsewhere, like worse interview loops. And if the 'cheater's workload' becomes the norm, you the non-cheater can be literally failed out of programs and scholarships because you didn't keep up.
[dead]
Re: CheatGPT
#543[dead]
Re: CheatGPT
#544[dead]