Live data from Hacker News

New video of Tesla crash demonstrates the problem of semi-automated driving

theautopian.com

541–550 of 714 posts

Re: New video of Tesla crash demonstrates the problem of semi-automated driving

#541
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So if an automaker can make a system that is capable of handling any driving task safely but occasionally ran itself off the road on purpose for no reason, as long as it’s a net positive in lives saved it should be allowed? I don’t agree with that assessment. It needs to make fewer mistakes than humans at all times , not just most of the time. Great with a disaster here and there is terrible.

Firstly, human error in at least 7 out of the 8 cars caused this. FSD didn't take control away from the human, it encountered something outside of it's limits and returned full control to the human. Secondly, that's what planes are. A lot of new plane safety comes from very automated, very complicated systems. In some situations these planes fail in a way that leaves the pilot in a more dangerous plane than one with…

My thought was that the cars following needed to have adaptive cruise control engaged and perhaps then the accidents would be avoided.

Re: New video of Tesla crash demonstrates the problem of semi-automated driving

#542
post #385

From what I can tell, the car behind the tesla didn't crash into the tesla but stopped before. And so did the car behind that one. It is the cars after that that crashed into each others. While automatic cars doing random things is certainly problematic, clearly the cause of the crash here isn't the tesla, it is other cars not respecting minimum safety distances and not able to stop when there is a traffic jam ahead.

> clearly the cause of the crash here isn't the tesla, it is other cars not respecting minimum safety distances

Try to park on the highway and claim the people who crash are at fault and see how it plays in a court of law

Re: New video of Tesla crash demonstrates the problem of semi-automated driving

#544

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you don't want to pass a car you just drop down the speed on cruise control and widen the gap between the car you don't want to pass and you. It really doesn't matter if you are 10m or 100m behind him if you are not going to pass it. And if you get too far behind him you might bump up the speed a notch. And if somebody gets in the gap it's even better because they are going to eventually overtake him just like the…

So basically doing manually what ACC does automatically for you

Yeah, just slower, while keeping bigger gap. Still beats fiddling with gas pedal.

Re: New video of Tesla crash demonstrates the problem of semi-automated driving

#545

This blind trust in technologies is very very wrong. We are part of the system and things should always be designed to keep us as powerful fallbacks/system-degradation resource.

I'd agree, yet I proceed from green lights with little regard; I drink the water from the tap; I use Paypal; I take aspirin from a bottle from heaven-knows-where.

We've entered the age of 'blind trust in technology'. We can hardly get out of bed without it.

Re: New video of Tesla crash demonstrates the problem of semi-automated driving

#547
post #385

From what I can tell, the car behind the tesla didn't crash into the tesla but stopped before. And so did the car behind that one. It is the cars after that that crashed into each others. While automatic cars doing random things is certainly problematic, clearly the cause of the crash here isn't the tesla, it is other cars not respecting minimum safety distances and not able to stop when there is a traffic jam ahead.

Suddenly stopping at high speed is generally considered (at least in the UK) dangerous driving and will get you prosecuted and probably mean you lose your license at the very least. If it results in a death then you can get a life sentence in prison for it. Intentionally stopping inside a tunnel is a pretty clear cut case of dangerous driving over here.

That's not the way the law works in the US. People are legally responsible for hitting something in front of them but not for getting read ended after slamming the breaks. Partially this is why the Tesla system is so trigger happy about braking. Brad Templeton goes into the design/legality issues around the accident in some detail here:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2023/01/11/an-8-c...

Re: New video of Tesla crash demonstrates the problem of semi-automated driving

#548

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No intention, no fault. But definitely unsafe lane change, I think.

> No intention, no fault. Nonsense.

Imagine it is a human driver saying that shadows on the road made him believe there was a person there so he slowed down to make sure.

He wouldn't be at fault for slowing down (after checking his eyesight).

Lane change is what makes Tesla at fault here, not unreasonable slowing down.

Re: New video of Tesla crash demonstrates the problem of semi-automated driving

#549
post #508

I'm trying to reason "why the Tesla did stop?", in the second video on TheIntercept website, I can notice a left exit before the point where the Tesla stopped. Something I noticed with Google maps ( I don't have a Tesla, and maybe the navigation system of the Tesla is similar ), is that sometimes thinks tunnels can access the road above them ( in a tunnel near my home Google maps always tells me "turn right" in the m…

Yeah, seems plausible. Tesla should implement a confidence-based system: if it detects an area with high chance of errors (e.g. tunnels), it should put the driver on high alert or disable the system. They probably already have a heatmap of driver interventions, which could be a starting point. The data might be usable for training a generalized confidence map.

> it should put the driver on high alert or disable the system.

The precedent is there, prior EAP did this. One interstate I frequent; it would do the interstate merge on ramp/junction fine going north; but heading south (with a 270 degree right turn) it would beep loudly and force a driver takeover.

Re: New video of Tesla crash demonstrates the problem of semi-automated driving

#550

I'm trying to reason "why the Tesla did stop?", in the second video on TheIntercept website, I can notice a left exit before the point where the Tesla stopped. Something I noticed with Google maps ( I don't have a Tesla, and maybe the navigation system of the Tesla is similar ), is that sometimes thinks tunnels can access the road above them ( in a tunnel near my home Google maps always tells me "turn right" in the m…

I found it easier to understand your example by comparing to openstreetmap, which seems up to date at that location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/54.64443/25.05401
Post reply on HN