Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Can you give some examples of parts of the UK constitution that are debated as much? If you don’t write it down, no debate, no consensus, everyone believes what suits his life style best. I am not saying writing it down is foolproof. “Write down a piece of document and don’t touch it for 200 years” is definitely not a good idea, it should be updated regularly. But if given the choice today of writing down or continu…
It’s not ‘verbal’ - I’m not sure how you think the UK works? It’s precedent. > a clear process for the document to be regularly edited and updated Sounds like you’re thinking of law or code rather than a constitution?
Multiple persons above refer to “constitution” as being a set of “beliefs”, “values” and “traditions”, I was pointing out that this is not a good solution in my view.