Live data from Hacker News

Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

nintendo.com

541–550 of 551 posts

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#541

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Telling you what you wanted to know wasn't an invitation to argue with me. I am the OP to whom you refer. I didn't mix the dates; you misread the antecedent to which "release date" referred and, in an effort to treat your response in good faith, I issued a mea culpa I then edited out when I realized that I had had it straight in the first place.

What did you had straight in the first place, the fact that your comment wasn't clear about if you where talking about Fallout 4 (like you said in the mea culpa that you now removed) or Skyrim Special Edition, or that you said it "came out 3 years ago"? Because neither Fallout 4, Skyrim original and Skyrim Special Edition "came out 3 years ago", and if you weren't going around editing your comments, my comment would…

The PS4 came out three years ago (almost exactly). Skyrim's recommended PC specs are somewhere below the PS4 in terms of performance. It's not an unclear sentence, and it isn't one that I edited.

You were mistaken. Your fictional Internet points aren't important. You should stop.

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#542
post #210

Maybe not a popular opinion right now... but I'm so glad there's at least one brand out there that isn't jumping the 'VR'/'AR' - bandwagon. I've tried to get into VR with the oculus and the VIVE, but no, it's just not for me. Happy to see Nintendo do what they do best: come up with a great formfactor, but let games be games.

I disagree. I think it's a massive lack of imagination on the part of manufacturers that has led to mediocre deployments. I think your comment reflects a sentiment that I agree with which is that HMD based systems today do not give the same degree of awe that happened when the NES came out - or even the playstation. I'd rather see Nintendo invest heavily ($5BN+) in an AR VRD and infrastructure that changes the landsc…

AR needs better hardware still. It needs very powerful GPU:s and processors, running at very low power with good and yet lightweight batteries.

While we probably can produce great AR content today and produce headsets to display it, it will likely take almost another decade before it can be made portable in something you WANT to use.

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#543
post #210

Maybe not a popular opinion right now... but I'm so glad there's at least one brand out there that isn't jumping the 'VR'/'AR' - bandwagon. I've tried to get into VR with the oculus and the VIVE, but no, it's just not for me. Happy to see Nintendo do what they do best: come up with a great formfactor, but let games be games.

This seems prime for AR to me. Head out with your device, catch some pokemon, then plug it into the big screen.

Most plausibly you could connect it to your phone for the AR experience á la Pokémon Go

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#544
I pretty much doubt the graphics quality could be that nice as shown in the demo while maintaining excellent battery power. Guess the final graphics won't be that much better than PS Vita. Still, looks like a really exciting concept so am really looking forward to the release and would like to see how it goes.

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#545

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having horsepower doesn't hurt, no matter how much Nintendo PR will try to spin it that way.

More horsepower can hurt because it's more expensive to produce content for (textures/polygons/realism expectations), and more money on the line for the studio means less creative risk taking permitted.

Possibly true in 2002 - not today, not since indie developed games got popular.

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#546

I feel like it will be mediocre at both living room and mobile gaming. How can it possibly be powerful enough to attract third party developers? Doesn't this compete with 3DS?

I actually think you're quite wrong. My NVIDIA Shield Android TV box is Tegra based, and it drives 4k games pretty darn decent. It's no PS4 but I don't need that (and PS4 can't do 4k games) and you don't need that to run good (non-VR) games. And Nintendo is apparently using their own custom Tegra SoC so it's likely a step above the couple year old Tegra that is in the Shield. Also the promo video shows Skyrim being p…

Thanks for sharing. Maybe my perception of what mobile-sized hardware can do is out-of-date.

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#547
post #391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Xbone and PS4 can both play Skyrim and Fallout 4. Nothing Nintendo's put out can come close. Just sayin'. Different people have different priorities when it comes to gaming.

Not sure if you noticed in the Switch launch video, but that's Skyrim they're playing. It looks like Nintendo is putting some effort into third party this time, and they'll be the only "console" which allows you to play "console" third party games portably. Pretty significant advantage.

It has Skyrim-- only 5 years late! So impressive.

The fact that they're showing off Skyrim, a 2011 game, in their 2017 console launch video doesn't say much for their hardware's abilities. It says a lot about how beloved Skyrim is, though.

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#548

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It has a bad UI. But the real killer is: games are still tied to hardware, not user account. Which means, if your console dies, you lose all your purchases. (Unless that's changed VERY recently.) If you're used to the Xbox store like the grandparent, going to the Nintendo Shop is like stepping back in time a decade.

I'm fairly confident you're incorrect. There's a single shared account between the 3DS and Wii U online stores, and I also know for sure that 3DS purchases are tied to your user account, rather than your hardware. I suppose it's possible that it works differently for the Wii U than the 3DS ecosystems, but that seems unlikely. You can still only have an account attached to a single console (of each type) at a time, bu…

The ACCOUNT is shared. But the PURCHASES are not.

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#549

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree. I think it's a massive lack of imagination on the part of manufacturers that has led to mediocre deployments. I think your comment reflects a sentiment that I agree with which is that HMD based systems today do not give the same degree of awe that happened when the NES came out - or even the playstation. I'd rather see Nintendo invest heavily ($5BN+) in an AR VRD and infrastructure that changes the landsc…

AR needs better hardware still. It needs very powerful GPU:s and processors, running at very low power with good and yet lightweight batteries. While we probably can produce great AR content today and produce headsets to display it, it will likely take almost another decade before it can be made portable in something you WANT to use.

Yes, that's the whole investment part. That stuff doesn't just appear - you have to build it.

Re: Nintendo Switch – New Video Game System [video]

#550

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Moore's law has been dead for about a decade bro. 3 years is a long time but IMO not enough to being a 100+ watt SoC down to ~20-30 required for that form factor. That being said, Nvidia is still much more energy efficient graphics wise vs AMD so I could see it getting fairly close - maybe 70-80%. CPU wise though I doubt they'll be as close just because of power.

The only reason to think Moore's law is dead now, much less a decade ago, is if you don't know what Moore's law actually is.[1] I don't blame you for that though, it was incorrectly explained for decades. Moore's law refers to the number of transistors, not speed. We've consistently added more transistors to CPUs, but through separate cores,since there are problems related to doing that usefully with a single core. N…

ther perf gains you're seeing are from architectural and software advancements not pure silicon

you cite nvidia as an example against it but nvidia itself clearly does is not of the same opinion

http://www.techradar.com/news/computing/nvidia-vp-claims-tha...

http://www.techdesignforums.com/blog/2015/12/11/iedm-arm-yer...

http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=13298...

http://www.extremetech.com/computing/123529-nvidia-deeply-un...

Post reply on HN