Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand - a white supremacist took a quantity from the DOJ, then took a percentage from the DOJ, and multiplied them together to get a new quantity. Does multiplication become invalid when a white supremacist does it? Or do DOJ stats become false when a racist cites them? Please, I would like to understand your logic. I do find it a bit scary that when I google "black on white crime", only racist sites sho…
White on white crimes are 5x common than black on white crimes. It's obvious cherry-picking.
You want to compare black on white crimes to white on black crimes. Not white on white crimes.
Across all races - they primarily commit crime against their own race. But some races receive more crime than they give.
Adjusted for population (there are far more white people than black people) there should be about equal white on black crime as black on white crime per capita. That isn't the case and is precisely what the data reads.
What is important isn't to jump to conclusions but rather investigate why. Which nobody wants to do unless they get labeled as a racist.