Honestly, I've been burned by hidden safety filters before. This is just a corporate version of that. Trust is already gone for me.
If Claude Fable stops helping you, you'll never know
531–534 of 534 posts
Re: If Claude Fable stops helping you, you'll never know
#532The 0.03% stat is meaningless when the definition of an AI company changes every year. Today it's training pipelines, tomorrow it's just using an API twice. Where's the line?
Re: If Claude Fable stops helping you, you'll never know
#533This is a fun peek into the economic implications of RSI/ASI. Because it's so infinitely valuable that it basically destroys all markets, labs will eventually do stuff like stop releasing models completely and skipping out on contracted commitments because they'll have the power to just drive their competitors out of business before the legal battle gets expensive. Cloud providers - at first smaller ones, then the hy…
Nothing is infinitely valuable.
A market with only a single good makes that good infinitely valuable for exchange purposes. No trade can happen - everyone is just sitting on a big pile of the only thing that matters and they can only trade it for less of the only thing that matters.
Re: If Claude Fable stops helping you, you'll never know
#534Aren't there immense security risks when the model is allowed to deceive even if it was for "good"? Reminds me of an excerpt from Edward Fredkin's "The intelligent machine" [1] https://noor.imx.sh/2017/09/30/when-they-communicate-they-co...
(can't edit the above but for future references, this doesn't seem to be by Edward Fredkin, and I couldn't find "The intelligent machine" as the article states
Still, this is a pre-LLM era copy-pasta it seems, and the idea within it is still relevant)