Live data from Hacker News

Magnifica Humanitas

vatican.va

531–540 of 1001 posts

Re: Magnifica Humanitas

#532
post #437

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"It is, therefore, not enough to state simply that men and women have equal dignity and rights; it is necessary that this be reflected in concrete decisions, such as in laws, access to employment, education, social and political responsibilities, and the way society listens to and values women’s contributions. As long as this gap persists, we cannot say that society truly and fully recognizes that women have the same…

In this case spiritual and political are one in the same.

Only if this is also the Pope declaring that women can be priests.

Re: Magnifica Humanitas

#533
post #493

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not a Roman Catholic but I am occasionally interested in what the Church has to say on ethical matters. What does the Church understand by "mystery of the person", and how does it relate to the assertion by the Church that, for example, gender (one aspect of the human subjective experience) can be understood purely in terms of biology?[0] 0. https://www.catholic.com/qa/the-churchs-position-on-transgen...

I don’t think you can take any writing by american TV priests as gospel

Sure, another source then: https://www.vox.com/2015/2/20/8078979/pope-francis-trans-rig...

I just cannot reconcile the idea of personhood being valuable with reducing humans to mere biology.

Re: Magnifica Humanitas

#534
post #493

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not a Roman Catholic but I am occasionally interested in what the Church has to say on ethical matters. What does the Church understand by "mystery of the person", and how does it relate to the assertion by the Church that, for example, gender (one aspect of the human subjective experience) can be understood purely in terms of biology?[0] 0. https://www.catholic.com/qa/the-churchs-position-on-transgen...

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” (Genesis 1:27, ESV)

Sure, but that was before the Fall.

Re: Magnifica Humanitas

#535
post #36
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Much of Western thought traces back to serious work by Church theologians. Even atheists are strongly influenced by the patterns they set down. The Catholic Church, for all its many faults, retains a serious intellectual tradition. (In fact I think atheists should make more effort to learn about the vast diversity of other faiths. It's very narrow to be atheist only about the Abrahamic deity. You end up incorporating…

> Much of Western thought traces back to serious work by Church theologians. The problem I have with this is that it's structurally a motte-and-bailey claim. If I have to take it literally, then it's obviously true and it's simply unserious to deny it: the Church does have a pervasive influence on Western civilization. The way it's often rhetorically used, however, is in opposition and to the exclusion of other stran…

The events you mention still took place within the Abrahamic framework of thought. Ideas like a linear timeline progressing from A to B (rather than a cyclical one) or utopian political projects bringing final justice to society are Abrahamic in nature.

So I agree with the grandparent comment: unless one takes the time to study and truly understand other belief systems, it's hard to see how Western "secular" schools of thought remain Christian because we're submerged in them since childhood.

Re: Magnifica Humanitas

#536
post #486

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The truly interesting question, and the crux of the matter, also hasn't changed much since 1903: How?

If you ignore everything that happened in between 1903 and today, it might seem like we've never made any progress on this, but at least in the US wealth inequality was demonstrably not as much as an issue for some of the time in between. For a time in the 20th century, it was possible for someone solidly middle class in the US to be able to save up a bit of money and afford a down payment on a house within a decade…

I do agree that the US handled the situation relatively well in the second half of the 20th century, plenty of such opportunities have been squantered badly.

But we cannot ignore that it was truly a unique opportunity:

- The US was the only intact industrial country left after WWII.

- With massive momentum from industrial deployment during the war.

- With a massive optimistic and hardened workforce coming home.

- With plenty of saved wartime income they didn't have a chance to spend due to rationing and shortages, a lot of it saved as wartime bonds just starting to deliver healthy yields.

- With the New Deal that resulted from the horrible Great Depression making sure they got to truly benefit from the fruits of their labour.

- And a wide-open global market to lend to and to sell to for rebuilding the world.

That is not something that can be replicated easily at any time, and if the US makes decisions expecting that that is the norm, there's a disaster coming (perhaps it's why it's a disaster now).

Re: Magnifica Humanitas

#537

This quote is from 1903. Times haven't changed that much: > Not a handful of rich people, but all the working people must enjoy the fruits of their common labour. Machines and other improvements must serve to ease the work of all and not to enable a few to grow rich at the expense of millions and tens of millions of people.

Hasn't AI been made available to millions of people?

Or is this the old hacker news trope again that nothing except full on communism will ever be acceptable?

Re: Magnifica Humanitas

#538

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We should just stop using the term DEI. It has been demonized in the common parlance so successfully that to a ton of people it no longer means 'people who are different are made valuable by that difference'- it's been demonized into essentially meaning 'give black people and women jobs they don't deserve'. It's a prime example of propaganda through language pollution. For whatever reason HN has been slowly goose ste…

> We should just stop using the term DEI. It has been demonized in the common parlance so successfully Whatever term you pick to describe a concerted effort to overcome the tendency to bigotry, they'll just hijack that, too. There's a whole industry built around this, and the media is so receptive to the right-wing that they'll openly describe how they'll do it[1], will execute the plans in public, and the mainstream…

Do you mean there’s a whole industry built around DEI? Or that there’s a whole industry built around countermessaging the DEI industry?

Re: Magnifica Humanitas

#539

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is that conclusion which differs from the post you replied to? The Amish are mindful about their technology adoption.

> The Amish are mindful about their technology adoption. The central idea concerning the Amish's relationship to technology is that only technology is allowed if it does not destroy their community. My personal values are much less based on upholding a community, but rather are much more rooted in individual freedom and independence. This means that I (likely) come to very different conclusions regarding this class o…

Yeah they probably wouldn't show up to a political rally because of this:

> Separation from Evil

> The community of Christians shall have no association with those who remain in disobedience and a spirit of rebellion against God. There can be no fellowship with the wickedness of this earthly world; therefore there can be no participation in the organizations, works, church services, meetings or civil affairs of those who live in contradiction to the commands of God (this may include Catholics and Protestants as well as other religions and pagans). All evil must be put away, including using weapons of force such as the sword and armor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schleitheim_Confession

Re: Magnifica Humanitas

#540

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love how excited you are about this and it's rubbing off on me.

I love numbered paragraphs, but this is the standard for religious texts, no? Famously so for centuries? I love it when old stuffy institutions are on the cutting-edge of clarity of communication as much as anyone else. (The SEC with its "HOW EQUIFAX NEGLECTED CYBERSECURITY AND SUFFERED A DEVASTATING DATA BREACH" report where nearly each section title was a complete sentence, making the Table of Contents also serve a…

Wow I had to Google that and it's amazing indeed!

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/imo/media/do... check that TOC, this is amazing and it should totally be a much more widespread thing.

In fact tbh I tried to get through this here Encyclical 3 times already but just didn't manage (knowing absolutely nothing about Catholicism except what's in the Dogma movie didn't help), and I can't help but think now that if it had a TOC like the Equifax report it'd be spectacular.

Post reply on HN