Live data from Hacker News

Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

finance.yahoo.com

531–540 of 1001 posts

Re: Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

#531

The people writing market commentary are simply making it up. The news about DeepSeek is not new and doesn't reduce the value of ASML. People are selling now because they are scared because the number went down.

>The people writing market commentary are simply making it up. Everyone except for you, right?

Oh no, I am making it up too.

Re: Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

#532

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you suggesting "AI madness" is a one time event that will not continue? AI is dramatically improving productivity and not just for developers. The "madness" will continue until every job is fully automated. That requires a lot of chips.

"AI", once we get there, is indeed the future and will continue to play an increasing role everywhere. But what happened to Nvidia profits last year is a one time event and will get back to normal sooner or later.

> last year is a one time event

It is repeating this year as well, given all the announcements. So maybe it is a two time event? I think it could repeat every year as long as Nvidia continues to innovate and keep their lead.

DeepSeek is providing an efficiency boost, and that doesn't kill Nvidia. In fact, Nvidia themselves delivered an efficiency boost with Blackwell chips. DeepSeek is a one-time efficiency boost, but Nvidia will continue to boost efficiency every year, based on Moore's law.

Re: Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

#533

Nvidia valuation = $3000B Nvidia profits during AI madness last year = $65B (last 4 quarters) Nvidia profits during normal year = $5B This stock could drop 90% from here, and still be expensive. The numbers are absolutely crazy and make no sense at all. Stargate project is aiming to invest $500B over 4 years. Those $500B are a pipe dream, but let's suppose for a second that all of that $500B will be Nvidia profits an…

> And you know what ? In that scenario Nvidia would STILL be overvalued by historical standards ! It would makes it's PE ratio about 24 (3000/(500/4)). AAPL's PE is about 36 at this moment. So no, not "overvalued by historical standards".

If you take a longer time frame, these PE ratios are indeed pretty high. Even 24 is much higher than the ~15 historical median https://www.multpl.com/s-p-500-pe-ratio

Re: Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

#534
post #424

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But the SOTA models basically all suck today. If people don’t think they suck, definitely in 1 year they’ll look back and consider those older models unusably bad

I recently went to the LLM chat arena and tried my "test input" against the latest frontier models that GPT 3 failed on. This test snippet simply repeats the same four-letter word in a paragraph many times using all of its various possible meanings simultaneously. The request to the AI is to put the meaning of each usage of the word next to it in brackets. None of the frontier models can do this perfectly. They all s…

> This test snippet simply repeats the same four-letter word in a paragraph many times using all of various possible meanings simultaneously

This sounds like fun. How does it do with an arbitrary quantity of "buffalo"s?

Re: Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

#536
post #341

IMO this is less about DeepSeek and more that Nvidia is essentially a bubble/meme stock that is divorced from the reality of finance and business. People/institutions who bought on nothing but hype are now panic selling. DeepSeek provided the spark, but that's all that was needed, just like how a vague rumor is enough to cause bank runs.

Not quite, I believe this sell off was caused by DeepSeek showing with their new model that the hardware demands of AI are not necessarily as high as everyone has assumed (as required by competing models). I've tried their 7b model, running locally on a 6gb laptop GPU. Its not fast, but the results I've had have rivaled GPT4. Its impressive.

I've run their distilled 70B model and didn't come away too impressed -- feels similar to the existing base model it was trained on, which also rivaled GPT4

Re: Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

#537
post #356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think less of that and more of real risks - Nvidia legitimately has the earnings right now. The question is how sustainable that is, when most of it is coming from 5 or so customers that are both motivated and capable of taking back those 90% margins for themselves

They don't have anything close to the earnings to justify the price they have reached. They are getting a lot of money, but their stock price is in a completely different universe. Not even that $500G deal people announced, if spent exclusively on their products could justify their current price. (Nah, notice that just the change on their valuation is already larger than that deal.)

Their forward PE is fairly reasonable: Nvidia 27, Apple 31, Amazon 38, Microsoft 33.

Re: Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

#538
A couple of things that caught my attention in context of the reactions from the AI community and investor community, but maybe im not fully read up. First, this seems to have been a surprise even amongst researchers but once released very transparent and open. Second, funded through a hedge fund.

Re: Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

#539
post #341

IMO this is less about DeepSeek and more that Nvidia is essentially a bubble/meme stock that is divorced from the reality of finance and business. People/institutions who bought on nothing but hype are now panic selling. DeepSeek provided the spark, but that's all that was needed, just like how a vague rumor is enough to cause bank runs.

This is a cookie cutter comment that appears to have been copy pasted from a thread about Gamestop or something. DeepSeek R1 allegedly being almost 50x more compute efficient isn't just a "vague rumor". You do this community a disservice by commenting before understanding what investors are thinking at the current moment.

I wonder where they got 50… llama405 cost like 60M, which puts deepseek at closer to 10x…

Re: Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout

#540

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> PRC companies breaking US export control laws is legal So long as they don't plan to do any business with the US or any of their allies I guess.

Which allies? The ones the current US president is threatening in all sorts of manner? I actually hope he doubles down. I would love for EU to rely less on the US. It would also reduce the reach of the silly embargoes that benefit no one but the US.

Destabilizing world trade and international relations isn't something that anyone not named Trump or Putin should be hoping for.
Post reply on HN