Earlier quoted context omitted.
The issue is that, for any company without thousands of employees (heck, probably even some of these are guilty), the VPN is often the only barrier to the entire network. The BeyondCorp model makes you explicitly specify "John can access support.corp.com but not admin.corp.com", while setting up these explicit checks is the exception for VPN-based access, not the norm (and sometimes it isn't even done right - eg. rel…
> The issue is that, for any company without thousands of employees (heck, probably even some of these are guilty), the VPN is often the only barrier to the entire network. Sorry, but what? I've worked in multiple small companies where the we where less than 5 system administrators and inside the vpn we had encrypted traffic and ldap auth on everything. It's a few days job for a single person to set everything up thi…
Who’s behind Wednesday’s epic Twitter hack?
531–536 of 536 posts
Re: Who’s behind Wednesday’s epic Twitter hack?
#532Earlier quoted context omitted.
People keep saying it could have started a war. Excuse me for being naive but come on—really? This is total sensationalism. What party wouldn’t verify something on twitter through diplomatic channels before going to war? Equity destruction: sure. War: no way.
Here's how I think it could be done: Get Trump's account, and tweet something like, "I've ordered a NUCLEAR STRIKE on China! The missiles are already in the air. The DEEP STATE is trying to take me out. They will try to silence me and delete these tweets and use deep fakes to say this was a hoax! The storm is here, Q is real, it's time to take up arms and kill democrats." Then continue tweeting escalating things over…
Only few people have Twitter accounts, it's a walled garden. Almost nobody cares what people shout in 140 chars, and likewise nobody cares about people streaming video on Twitch or YouTube in 20 min, what could be written publicly and read in 10 seconds.
Re: Who’s behind Wednesday’s epic Twitter hack?
#533Earlier quoted context omitted.
People keep saying it could have started a war. Excuse me for being naive but come on—really? This is total sensationalism. What party wouldn’t verify something on twitter through diplomatic channels before going to war? Equity destruction: sure. War: no way.
How about civil war, or at least large-scale riots?
Re: Who’s behind Wednesday’s epic Twitter hack?
#534Earlier quoted context omitted.
The same could be said for radio, whether Orson Wells "Alien Invasion" broadcast or the multitude of April 1st jokes that got out of hand.
Apparently the "fallout" was an exaggeration that Orson went along with because it gave him more publicity. From the Wikipedia: >"The supposed panic was so tiny as to be practically immeasurable on the night of the broadcast. ... Radio had siphoned off advertising revenue from print during the Depression, badly damaging the newspaper industry. So the papers seized the opportunity presented by Welles’ program to discr…
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas...
Re: Who’s behind Wednesday’s epic Twitter hack?
#535Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't need 2FA to deactivate 2FA? That seems like a big flaw.
Yup. The interesting thing is that this 2FA exploit was posted to hacker news two days before the twitter hack. It's possible someone seized the opportunity before it was fixed.
Re: Who’s behind Wednesday’s epic Twitter hack?
#536Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup. The interesting thing is that this 2FA exploit was posted to hacker news two days before the twitter hack. It's possible someone seized the opportunity before it was fixed.
Do you have a link to that? Didn't see it here on HN.