Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can accomplish "no ads" and arguably substantially less tracking without Premium, though, with (e.g.) firefox and ublock origin. The only downside is an occasional ignorable warning that you're "seeing interruptions".
How does that get money to the people making the videos I like watching?
Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions
521–530 of 533 posts
Re: Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions
#522Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can accomplish "no ads" and arguably substantially less tracking without Premium, though, with (e.g.) firefox and ublock origin. The only downside is an occasional ignorable warning that you're "seeing interruptions".
Not when watching on an Apple TV.
Re: Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions
#523It's very difficult to do business in Western Europe without Whatsapp. I have probably asked more than 60 people to switch to Signal and the social burden it introduces (i.e. asking a new acquaintance to install a new app) can have negative signalling effects (e.g. you don't adapt, create more work, why do you care so much about privacy, etc.) I personally abhore Facebook (and IG,Whatsapp) and don't want to use any o…
Re: Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions
#524Discord subscriptions seem to be working. People like to customize their profile (ie express themselves), even though profiles are not something frequently interacted with (that's the surprising part!) I have a server (for my game) with about 1000 people. Out of the 300 people logged in, 50 of them have custom profiles. So, it seems like a good idea for Meta.
if this prevents them from adding privacy-harming things to whatsapp, the more power to them. but it certainly does not guarantee this behaviour.
Re: Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions
#525Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Guess how many of them will actually do it? That's how much they value your friendship then :)
But you all already have Instagram. If someone wants everyone else to sacrifice to suit them, that sounds like a selfish person and a selfish friend.
Re: Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions
#526Earlier quoted context omitted.
Trusting a server doesn't prevent it from being easily targetable.
Yes, it does. It's much harder to target thousands of servers instead of a single huge one.
Re: Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions
#527Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, it does. It's much harder to target thousands of servers instead of a single huge one.
And Big Tech are the one who host your account on thousands of servers versus federation where it lives on one. If that one server host gets sued or ddosed you will be unable to lose your account. Meanwhile Big Tech can withstand DDOS attacks and lawsuits.
The Big Tech single server will experience a lot more attacks, some of which it can't withstand. Related example: Apple App Store was forced to delete a hundred VPNs after the pressure of Russian government.