Live data from Hacker News

Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

yle.fi

521–530 of 593 posts

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#521

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Hacker News has plenty of its own echo chamber, no different to any other social environment. Sure, but fwiw the HN echo chamber is organic. People choose to interact with people who have similar opinions, as they have since forever. In contrast, the echo chamber on HN, Tiktok, FB, etc is architected specifically to drive engagement. You are shown more of the content that you react to, so that you won't leave.

It's not at all organic. There's lots of flag killing and shadow banning on HN to suppress opinions, mostly anything that hints of right wing stuff. It mostly works, too.

No, they block political stuff because this is not the place for political stuff.

Stop playing the victim.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#522

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What I find particularly bad about Reddit is the platform is specifically designed to amplify group think and silence competing opinions. All it takes is five more downvotes than upvotes and a comment will lose visibility. It can turn subreddits into little bubbles where like-minded people upvote each other and almost never have to see dissenting opinions. That may not be a big deal on a gardening subreddit, but it c…

Hot take: a voting system (and generally any move toward ranking content rather than displaying it chronologically) will inevitably rot any social media platform. Just a question of time.

I'm going to say that the rot starts to occur whenever the amount of users gets too big. Too many people seems to ruin everything.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#523
post #468

Earlier quoted context omitted.

prohibit all proprietary software

That won't help. They'll open-source it, and the addiction stays.

Haven't you heard about the four freedoms? The software which meets this criteria is totally safe.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#524

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I no longer call them social media. Social media is the correct name for what they are now, they're channels that push curated content out to their users. The thing they used to be is social networking.

What is social about it tho?

You can gang up on people with low effort, negative comments about anything.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#525
post #450

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't care if I sound old and salty when I say this: I miss phpBB I'll one-up this: I miss USENET. I never understood how anyone could like phpBB, compared to USENET news readers, it was a chaotic mess. But USENET, that was great for discussing things.

Usenet before the Eternal September? I remember using some forums, and there'd be pages and pages of idiots just replying "Wow, this is great, thanks OP!", or "Thanks from me too!". How the fuck do you think you're contributing rather than polluting? And nowadays they can even create Github accounts and do this...

> Usenet before the Eternal September?

Even well after it, in many places. The effect wasn't universally immediate.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#526

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>What are your thoughts on lemmy, I was hopeful when I found out about it... The trouble I think, going forward, is that no matter how good the technology of a new forum might be, everyone is primed and ready to flock to it. How could anything be good if the same 500,000 redditors that turned it into shit show up the first week? Worse, even if they don't, there are all sorts of crackpots who try to preempt by coloniz…

I completely understand your comment and found the reference to eternal september fascinating and how it happened 35 years ago and people were talking about internet being too crowded. thanks for reference, learnt something new. > there are all sorts of crackpots who try to preempt by colonizing new ones early hoping that they can sway the thing once it gets big I do wonder if software can be used to prevent this tho…

> I mean Hackernews came after reddit and its community

HN is a weird thing. I think it just managed the perfect storm of improbabilities. It managed to find just enough audience for it to be interesting, but didn't reach a critical mass that sees it going exponential (possibly its subject matter repels popular interest and especially youth interest). It has a one-man (or at least tiny moderation) team that (somehow) resists the urge to do anything but put the smackdown on bad actors (possibly the hard rule against political stories helps). And as the last refuge of people who hate Facebookization, it's also possible there is zero demand for it to be swipe-able and phone-centric.

But, in truth, it is also sort of fossilized, and will die once our generation (and -a-half) retires and has little time for it. So we've got 15 or 20 years more, and it will shrink as it goes, and then one day it'll just be gone. It won't even be here to memorialize its demise.

>I do wonder if this can be replicated with the communities that you mention tho.

Maybe someone is more clever than I, and can figure it out. But I've spent nearly 20 years at this point, and I've come up with squat. I think the forums that people did enjoy (for awhile) were completely organic and just can't be artificially created.

>Or what exactly would you classify as "shit show"?

It's difficult to even describe what you're missing, if you weren't there to see it for yourself. It didn't start with reddit, it didn't start with Slashdot, I'm not even sure what it did start with that's before my time. Are you even aware that many of these websites didn't even require an account to post? That was only if you wanted your name attached to some comment that was really clever. There was this sweet spot though, where it all converged. It was post-internet-boom, so some of the people who were posting had hobbies besides the internet itself... making for conversations about anything and everything. And, as a rule, people weren't jaded about it in general... people weren't expecting you to be rude or have some agenda. If they could even imagine that, then it was you were a spammer trying to sell something which was more junk than scam. There was the idea that if the software/website itself were bad, eventually it would be improved. Everything was text/typing/reading, so it was literate and not 10 second tiktok garbage. Phone-texting hadn't quite spoiled everything with text-speech. People managed to get fed up with bad design and bad behavior, there were so-called exoduses. And, from time to time, it was possible to be noticed without Russian mafia connections or Illuminati endorsements.

What we have now is quite possibly the worst possible timeline, so to speak. All of the points I've mentioned don't even quite begin to describe what's changed.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#527
post #284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There’s a whole vibrant industry of people you can pay to market whatever you want on Reddit. They can’t all be competing for the same few popular subreddits. They must be differentiated by targeting niche subreddits.

There's about 138,000 active subreddits. I don't believe that this industry is targetting even a majority of them.

You can advertise on Reddit. If the return/cost ratio of industrialized astroturfing is better than ads then people will use it to promote their products.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#528

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Once again I am hoping for a ban on _smart_phones. Not laptops. Not tablets (although those could get tricky I admit). Not dumb phones. Details will need to be worked out (like smart watches or future VR devices). Maybe a combination of: - SIM - large enough screen or video playback capability - camera Easier to democratise enforcement (report and fine) and you don’t need to rely on the very platforms you are trying…

I think that's misguided. It's tricky to define a smart phone in a useful fashion as kids could get hold of mini devices that have wifi and bluetooth, but no other phone connections and surely that would be as bad as the smart phones. I don't really see the issue with smart phones themselves - the problem is the attention whoring platforms that are warping people's minds and especially with young people, pushing unre…

IMO the problem has two parts to it. The platforms and the hardware that allows near constant read access to it and instant write access.

Taking away the hardware half is easier and will have enough effect to force people out of the addiction.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#529
post #507
post #447

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah because soup.io (Blogspam Link today) simply lost its data because they didn't migrate and the hard drive crashed.

That's what killed them? I thought it was just financially unsustainable.

Platform was dying for years before it was finally financially interoperable, before that they've lost over a year worth of contents due to some corrupted hardware. I can't exactly remember for sure that this happened during a migration, but the corruption of the main database was the main cause to lose that data.

In the end, there was just not enough money to justify keeping it alive.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#530
post #443

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's about 138,000 active subreddits. I don't believe that this industry is targetting even a majority of them.

That number alone is a very good reason for the industry to target as much of it as they can / dare. You say "sudreddit". Marketing teams say "self-selecting target segment".

You'd think so, and yet Reddit adds suck.
Post reply on HN