Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

Post by marcosdumay » Thu, Oct 23, 2025, 4:07 PM UTC

calvinmorrison wrote: post #511

ethbr1 wrote: post #503

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The issue is that current law around monopolies defines them from the wrong angle. Instead of taking a consumer-centric / competition perspective, they should be defined in terms of market share (with markets broadly defined from a consumer perspective). >10% = some minimal interoperability and reporting requirements >25% = serious interoperability requirements >35% = severe and audited interoperability requirements,…

well exactly, Verizon, Amazon, etc all LOVE more regulation. they have armies of lawyers who not only help in constructing the laws, they help pass, lobby and implement them. then the same law firms help amazon, verizon, etc execute it. It's regulatory capture now a small competitor wants to do something like get into the wifi game and they're look at huge fixed fees to get started.

Post by immibis » Thu, Oct 23, 2025, 4:10 PM UTC

masafej536 wrote: post #376

dmoreno wrote: post #288

Happened to me last week. One morning we wake up and the whole company website does not work. Not advice with some time to fix any possible problem, just blocked. We gave very bad image to our clients and users, and had to give explanations of a false positive from google detection. The culprit, according to google search console, was a double redirect on our web email domain (/ -> inbox -> login). After just moving…

This looks like the same suicide inducing type of crap by google that previously only android devs on playstore were subject to.

Post by fsflover » Thu, Oct 23, 2025, 4:15 PM UTC

Timwi wrote: post #315

kossTKR wrote: post #300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm beginning to seriously think we need a new internet, another protocol, other browsers just to break up the insane monopolies that has been formed, because the way things are going soon all discourse will be censored, and competitors will be blocked soon. We need something that's good for small and medium businesses again, local news and get an actual marketplace going - you know what the internet actually promise…

It won't get anywhere unless it addresses the issue of spam, scammers, phishing etc. The whole purpose of Google Safe Browsing is to make life harder for scammers.

Post by ApolloFortyNine » Thu, Oct 23, 2025, 4:19 PM UTC

0xbadcafebee wrote: post #65

arccy wrote: post #8

If you're going to host user content on subdomains, then you should probably have your site on the Public Suffix List https://publicsuffix.org/list/ . That should eventually make its way into various services so they know that a tainted subdomain doesn't taint the entire site....

In the past, browsers used an algorithm which only denied setting wide-ranging cookies for top-level domains with no dots (e.g. com or org). However, this did not work for top-level domains where only third-level registrations are allowed (e.g. co.uk). In these cases, websites could set a cookie for .co.uk which would be passed onto every website registered under co.uk. Since there was and remains no algorithmic meth…

Post by superconduct123 » Thu, Oct 23, 2025, 4:23 PM UTC

lucideer wrote: post #349

NelsonMinar wrote: post #6

Be sure to see the team's whole list of Cursed Knowledge. https://immich.app/cursed-knowledge

I love Immich & greatly appreciate the amazing work the team put into maintaining it, but between the OP & this "Cursed Knowledge" page, the apparent team culture of shouting from the rooftops complaints that expose their own ignorance about technology is a little concerning to be honest. I've now read the entire Cursed Knowledge list & - while I found some of them to be invaluable insights & absolutely love the idea…