Live data from Hacker News

Stargate Project: SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, MGX to build data centers

apnews.com

521–530 of 1001 posts

Re: Stargate Project: SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, MGX to build data centers

#521
post #278

What will be powering all these data centers? The thought of exponentially increasing our fossil fuel consumption scares the hell out of me.

Texas is the leading state in new grid batteries and grid solar for three years now. Also Governor Abbott deregulated nuclear last year. Sure there will be some new natural gas too, which is the least scary fossil fuel. They call it the "all of the above" approach to energy.

Re: Stargate Project: SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, MGX to build data centers

#522

Where are they getting the $500B? Softbank's market cap is 84b and their entire vision fund is only $100b, Oracle only has $11b cash on hand, OpenAI's only raised $17b total...

SoftBank's current AUM is $350B [1], and they will likely raise another fund.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoftBank_Group

Re: Stargate Project: SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, MGX to build data centers

#523
post #46

What a waste of a great name. Why form a separate company for this?

To get out from under OpenAI’s considerable obligation to Microsoft. That is why there is the awkward “we’ll continue to consume Azure” sentence in there. Will be interesting to see if it works or if MS starts revving up their lawyers.

Doesn't MS own 49% of OpenAI?

Re: Stargate Project: SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, MGX to build data centers

#524

~$125B per year would be 2-3% of all domestic investment. It's similar in scale to the GDP of a small middle income country. If the electric grid — particularly the interconnection queue — is already the bottleneck to data center deployment, is something on this scale even close to possible? If it's a rationalized policy framework (big if!), I would guess there's some major permitting reform announcement coming soon.

Maybe they will invest in nuclear reactors. Data center, AI and nuclear power stations. Three advanced technologies, that's pretty good.

Wind, solar, and gas are all significantly cheaper in Texas, and can be brought online much quicker. Of course it wouldn't hurt to also build in some redundancy with nuclear, but I believe it when I see it, so far there's been lots of talk and little success in new reactors outside of China.

Re: Stargate Project: SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, MGX to build data centers

#525

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Largest GPU cluster at the moment is X.ai's 100K H100's which is ~$2.5B worth of GPUs. So, something 10x bigger (1M GPUs) is $25B, and add $10B for 1GW nuclear reactor. This sort of $100-500B budget doesn't sound like training cluster money, more like anticipating massive industry uptake and multiple datacenters running inference (with all of corporate America's data sitting in the cloud).

Shouldn't there be a fear of obsolescence?

It seems you'd need to figure periodic updates into the operating cost of a large cluster, as well as replacing failed GPUs - they only last a few years if run continuously.

I've read that some datacenters run mixed generation GPUs - just updating some at a time, but not sure if they all do that.

It'd be interesting to read something about how updates are typically managed/scheduled.

Re: Stargate Project: SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, MGX to build data centers

#526

~$125B per year would be 2-3% of all domestic investment. It's similar in scale to the GDP of a small middle income country. If the electric grid — particularly the interconnection queue — is already the bottleneck to data center deployment, is something on this scale even close to possible? If it's a rationalized policy framework (big if!), I would guess there's some major permitting reform announcement coming soon.

One possibility would be just to build their own power plants colocated with the datacenters and not interconnect at all.

I like how you think this is possible.

Re: Stargate Project: SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, MGX to build data centers

#528

I'm confused and a bit disturbed; honestly having a very difficult time internalizing and processing this information. This announcement is making me wonder if I'm poorly calibrated on the current progress of AI development and the potential path forward. Is the key idea here that current AI development has figured out enough to brute force a path towards AGI? Or I guess the alternative is that they expect to figure…

"There are maybe a few hundred people in the world who viscerally understand what's coming. Most are at DeepMind / OpenAI / Anthropic / X but some are on the outside. You have to be able to forecast the aggregate effect of rapid algorithmic improvement, aggressive investment in building RL environments for iterative self-improvement, and many tens of billions already committed to building data centers. Either we're a…

My prediction is a Apple loses to Open AI who releases a H.E.R. (like the movie) like phone. She is seen on your lock screen a la a Facetime call UI/UX and she can be skinned to look like whoever; i.e. a deceased loved one.

She interfaces with AI Agents of companies, organizations, friends, family, etc to get things done for you (or to learn from..what's my friends bday his agent tells yours) automagically and she is like a friend. Always there for you at your beckon call like in the movie H.E.R.

Zuckerberg's glasses that can not take selfies will only be complimentary to our AI phones.

That's just my guess and desire as fervent GPT user, as well a Meta Ray Ban wearer (can't take selfies with glasses).

Re: Stargate Project: SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, MGX to build data centers

#530
post #93

Last year, sama goal was 5 to 7T. Now he is going with 100B, with option for another 400B. Huge numbers, but it still feels like a bit of a down turn.

That 5T figure was including chip manufacturing. Duplicating TSMC isn't feasible. No surprise.
Post reply on HN