Live data from Hacker News

Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

meta.com

521–530 of 967 posts

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#521

It is absolutely incredible to me that Facebook thinks it still has the social capital to pull a product like this off. To me the question of whether smart glasses are a good idea in general either socially or commercially is somewhat secondary to the elephant in the room: "would I wear glasses made by Facebook?" And... no, of course not, of course I wouldn't do that. I guess people buy Oculus still so it's not like…

[deleted]

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#522
post #383

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> someone who had their phone in their hand? I feel like I have a good idea when someone is recording or not. Phone orientation and behavior is different.

With the macro lens mode on iPhones now, you can take a video of what’s directly in front of you while pointing the camera at a downward angle. There’s no way to tell a person doing that apart from a person who’s texting, other than looking at their screen.

I posted elsewhere in this thread but I think we can still detect this. There is a framing/tracking motion people do when recording that's not present when just texting or using the phone.

> Brain imaging has shown that the brain cells which are activated when a test subject can see that they are being stared at are distinct from the cells activated when the starer's eyes are averted away from the subject by just a few degrees

From Wikipedia[1], but I admit the claim is needing a citation but I feel strongly for the gaze detection argument at least.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychic_staring_effect

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#524
post #483

Wearing Google Glass made you a glasshole. Snapchat Spectacles spectacularly never took off. I hope these Smart Glasses make you look dumb and nobody buys them. I think the major issue is the camera, for me ... What i would pay for is minimalist eyewear with a heads-up display. That would be useful

[deleted]

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#528

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am currently in the middle of rebuilding a pair of 6.2L small block Chevrolet engines. By a factor of six these are the largest engines I've ever worked on, and the rebuild is far more extensive than anything I've attempted before too. During the teardown, part of my process (let's not dignify it with "workflow") has been photographing the incredible amount of crap that's been bolted to the engines as I remove piec…

For what is worth, on my phone double click on the power button located on the side jumps into camera mode (even if locked). And pressing the volume down takes the photo. Then one click on the power button to turn off. click-click, click, click. And assuming the Google software doesn't decide to lag too much, it's quite quick to, and it reduces how much you touch the phone with dirty gloves. edit: I should add that y…

FWIW it sounds like you have a pixel. Other androids aren't quite the same, but often have similar shortcuts.

The pixel is very quick to get the camera open, as you say.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#529

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am currently in the middle of rebuilding a pair of 6.2L small block Chevrolet engines. By a factor of six these are the largest engines I've ever worked on, and the rebuild is far more extensive than anything I've attempted before too. During the teardown, part of my process (let's not dignify it with "workflow") has been photographing the incredible amount of crap that's been bolted to the engines as I remove piec…

Take comfort in one thing: you’re rebuilding one of the most popular and prolific platforms for hot rodders in the last 20 years. You can probably throw a rock and hit someone who can legitimately help you, haha. Rebuilding a junkyard ls (okay yours isn’t a 5.3 ) is like the rite of passage

I used to know a robdel.

Does 312 mean anything to you?

Edit: it's you--I stalked your comments. Emacs? Christ, I thought I showed you a better example.

Re: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses

#530

Lack of HUD is why I wouldn't get these. I suppose if I was taking more pictures / video I might be more interested, like at the beach or something, but I don't find myself doing these things as much. Maybe this would make it easier for me to capture my life around me (my SO thinks i don't take enough pictures or video of our life), could alleviate having to remember to pull out the phone and such. Add a HUD like goo…

This - having an actual display that doesn't look gaudy would be great. For pictures and video, Google already tried the glasshole thing.
Post reply on HN