Live data from Hacker News

Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

inputmag.com

521–530 of 562 posts

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#521
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some, but not most. And cameras have a lot longer life than other tech, so my guess would be that 99% of cameras in use don’t have the ability to connect via USB-C.

Just permanently stick a tiny USB-A to USB-C adapter on the cable and they instantly do have the ability to connect via USB-C. It's that easy!

But why? Why does it make sense to someone to remove SD card slot?

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#522

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That sounds like a terrible idea. Why have a proprietary charge port if it can also charge with USB-C?

Yes, a terrible idea, like putting a motor on a sailboat! I mean, why would you ever need 2 methods of propulsion?! (Some boaters even bring oars and towline! Insane!)

You obviously don't sail. You need a motor on a sailboat to either fight a strong tide to dock, to escape an incoming storm if the wind is pushing you towards a storm. Many other uses such as regenerating the batteries so you have your food not spoil. Sails/masts/rigging also fail so you need a backup to get you to port in an emergency.

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#523

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>However vast majority of the time I use external keyboard+trackpad+monitor ... > one-cable-for-everything, making traveling lighter How those two work together? Do you take external monitor , trackpad and keyboard with you ? It looks like most of the time you are not using your laptop as a laptop, when you need everything on the go and you wish to be prepared for diff scenarios. Then you wish laptop as much packed a…

You can have your stuff in many places, and travel between them. I have monitors and keyboards in my home, my office and my parents home.

Sure, it’s just you do not use ‘laptop abilities’ too much in such scenario compared to fully mobile setup. That’s why you have no need for many mobile requirements that only laptop can deliver.

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#524
post #357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't this the reason to push for no more ports than the USB-C. After the Macbook become USB-C only, manufacturers started to move to USB-C instead of USB-A and some of them include an adapter. The quicker we move, the better. It'll be a little painful at first, but then we'll have only USB-C for everything.

I’ve been hearing this argument for years now. Years of pain, and I still don’t feel like we’re any closer to this supposed future. Maybe it was a mistake?

I charge my phone on my laptop charger, and charge my laptop on my dock. When I want to undock my laptop, I disconnect a single cable. I have two monitors that can run off a phone or a laptop using just a USB cable (no power supply). I can even charge my MBP off a Lenovo charger without a second thought.

None of this was possible prior to those "years of pain." I personally welcome our USB-C overlords.

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#525
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most consumers miss being able to simply connect their laptop to their tv with an HDMI cable, but they know they have no voice in this modern day enlightened absolutism.

There's are plenty of USB-C to HDMI cables and TVs also come with USB-C I outs these days. We're in a weird transition phase, but going back to multiple different ports would be silly.

transition phase that has lasted around what, 4 years already?

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#526
post #496

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I buy a computer, I want something that makes my life better. I do not want something that deliberately makes my life worse to achieve a strategic goal for Apple Computer. We saw the same thing with Flash. Apple didn't like Flash and wanted it dead. They couldn't manage to kill it off through negotiation or outreach or by offering a better alternative, so they instead decided to weaponize the iPhone by refusing…

Which was a net positive for the Internet? But this is not a companies' war, but rather a specs war (USB vs A bunch). Apple is not pushing for its own interests only on this one, but for the interest of everyone.

That is entirely irrelevant to my point. Apple used its monopoly power to make its users buy an inferior product so that others would have no choice but to adapt. How many of those users, given the option, would choose to buy a machine with no Flash support or with only one type of port?

It is, by the way, absolutely not a clear advantage to get rid of old ports. USB C is about five years old. It is absolutely ludicrous to claim that any peripheral older than USB C is obsolete. That goes double for audio equipment. I have decades-old equipment that is still excellent by modern standards, but Apple has decided it's got to go because the 3.5mm headphone jack is unfashionable. If I were an Apple customer I would have no choice but to throw out all my electronics every few years or carry around a suitcase of adapters.

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#527

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am always amazed at how people do not even think of this excellent use-case (let alone use it). This is something I have always loved in laptops and have used. Besides that card is barely even visible unlike a pen drive or a hard disk. It just stays there subtly. I was also planning to have a bootable Linux on one of those, but I never got around to actually doing that. Now that my 2012 MBA's flash storage is dead…

Probably because carrying your backup inside of your device is a horrible way to preserve your media in the event that the device is lost or stolen.

No, I won't.

I will still have data on rsync.net, b2, Tarsnap, borgbase, some even in Dropbox. Also, the weekly backup to my external hard disk.

That card is more like regular/scheduled backup sink (encrypted data) like those cloud destinations I mentioned above to help with laptop malfunctioning or just dumping some data on it quickly when I want to take it with me (that's rare though).

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#528
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I have never needed an SD card, and have gone all-in on USB-C. I will be very disappointed if they add back in USB-A/HDMI/SD ports, or remove USB-C charging in favor of proprietary charge port. Sounds like unnecessary feature bloat. I'm on the same side, though I wouldn't mind one-two USB-A ports added for when I'm on the go in a hurry without a USB-C/A cable. Or the addition of some smart "mag-safe but still usabl…

> one thing is clear: ... Apple has to make its choices and be done with it. It is not clear to me why Apple cannot sell a small handful of models. Two otherwise identical machines, one all-in on usb-c, the other with a mix of ports.

>It is not clear to me why Apple cannot sell a small handful of models. Two otherwise identical machines, one all-in on usb-c, the other with a mix of ports.

No technical reason, that's just not how Apple rolls.

If they do that, they do it with 2 different models (where the lack/presense of some feature makes sense based on the target market, e.g. college students), not with two otherwise identical models.

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#529
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am partial to the samsung fit usb drives. You can boot off of them in a pinch. But current usb-c devices need a dongle.

I've got a USB drive that is USB-A on one side and USB-C on the other.

I'm guessing you will have probably have cheaper/larger options for usb-a flash drives.

This stuff is just like firewire. Maybe it will be different in 5 or 10 years.

Re: Apple's MacBook revival plan: Bring back old features

#530

The article's criticism of the 12-inch MacBook are preposterous. The 2 lb Macbook is the best laptop I've ever owned, by far. Maybe I'm too sensitive about weight, but I feel an incredible difference between 3 lb and 2 lb laptops, especially if its sitting on your lap for extended periods of time. The keyboard and charger have never once been a hindrance to my workflow, as the article makes it out be. I really wish A…

I agree I wish Apple would find a way to make a 16inch MBP weight 3lbs and an Air weigh 2lbs. It *seems* possible given an 12.9 inch iPad Pro only weighs 1.4lbs and other manufacturers have entries in that range. For whatever reason this idea always gets downvoted but I believe it will happen someday and every who downvoted will suddenly "get it".

I wonder when will Apple stop using Unibody for MacBooks. I don't like the body overall because it's heavier, too cool on winter, and its style not attracting not much anymore.
Post reply on HN