Live data from Hacker News

Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

arstechnica.com

521–530 of 607 posts

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#521

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok you got me with "overlooking the ocean". I will admit, I was a little bit envious. But then I recalled the great Terry Pratchett quote that you are living on a continent where pretty much every animal, except for maybe some sheep, is equipped with some venom and actively trying to kill you. Plus some of the plants. So I guess it's fair play.

Heh Heh Heh. Well, Isaac Butterfields response applies: https://youtu.be/t1uZZ_xRYvQ?t=153 Snakes and spiders are pretty much it. Snakes are very rare to see unless you travel to the bush. Spiders though, are common outside. Once you've learned not to turn over rocks in your garden (with your bare hands anyway), you're fine. :)

> Once you've learned not to turn over rocks in your garden

You have no idea how ridiculous that sounds to me.

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#522

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What he said. From the article: > While 60Mbps isn't a gigabit, it's on par with some of the lower cable speed tiers and is much higher than speeds offered by many DSL services in the rural areas LOWER?! Cable doesn't even serve non-television use near me. Phone lines can carry 5 Mbps DSL if you're lucky . I happen to have a line-of-sight to a major radio tower so I get wifi from a mom-and-pop ISP, with a 10 Mbps cap…

Modern VDSL can reach around 200mbps at distances something around 3-5 km from exchange. DSL obviously lower but possibly similar to Starlink. All that said you can those speeds with Starlink anywhere, for much less than installing a phone line.

In lab conditions with cat5 cable perhaps.

In the real world, the copper in the ground or on the pole is close to a century old, and probably qualifies as cat2 if you are lucky.

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#523

Earlier quoted context omitted.

SpaceX isn't doing the install work work on these Starlink kits. They just sell you some hardware. If you're a terrestrial-based internet provider, you need a fleet of installers and they also have to do constant maintenance work. They have salaries and they make (lots of) overtime pay. At a lot of the smaller companies (like the one I worked at) they have pensions. We had a lot of guys who started with the company o…

This is absolutely not true. They are still selling you a dish in a terminal that most of the population could not install themselves on their house. The majority of the installs will be professionaly done.

That's not what I'm saying. Forest for trees.

SpaceX isn't doing the installation work. They're not hiring the fleet of techs to do the work.

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#524
post #303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Absolutely! As someone who lived in a third world country for 2.5y (2014-2016), I had to resort to satellite internet for semi-reliable uplink. I have to admit that I’m not too familiar with the differences between Starlink and what’s already available, but what I do know is that I had to settle for 4/0.5mbit and was really happy with it. Reliability of the connection was much more important than the throughout.

Where did you live?

Cambodia.

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#525
post #269
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Man that's bad, here in Switzerland my Line was upgraded to 10Gbs from 1 and i was mad that the router just had four 1Gbs and one 2.5Gbs cable ports...so i had to buy the business model router with fiber LAN (witch i like much more..thinner cables).

Nice, what canton are you in?

Zurich, but outside city.

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#526

This is already quite an achievement! In just 10 launches, SpaceX is operating the world's largest satellite constellation and can already provide broadband of reasonable quality to some customers. In rural areas, I have struggled to catch weak LTE signals with fixed antennas that often didn't hit these speed and latency numbers. This absolutely seems on track to be an excellent alternative to rural LTE or existing s…

Australian (Sydney, 30 minutes train from CBD) here, I pay $60/m for 45mbps but my line potential is 35mbps. My average speed is around 20mbps (just ran a speedtest and it was 22mbps).

Some places have 100mbps, but most don't live in those areas. I am lucky to get the speeds that I do, honestly.

I'm watching both 5g and starlink with great interest as they will be up and running before the next infrastructure initiative by the government.

Maybe Sydney is actually rural and we don't know it yet

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#527

This is already quite an achievement! In just 10 launches, SpaceX is operating the world's largest satellite constellation and can already provide broadband of reasonable quality to some customers. In rural areas, I have struggled to catch weak LTE signals with fixed antennas that often didn't hit these speed and latency numbers. This absolutely seems on track to be an excellent alternative to rural LTE or existing s…

Australian (Sydney, 30 minutes train from CBD) here, I pay $60/m for 45mbps but my line potential is 35mbps. My average speed is around 20mbps (just ran a speedtest and it was 22mbps). Some places have 100mbps, but most don't live in those areas. I am lucky to get the speeds that I do, honestly. I'm watching both 5g and starlink with great interest as they will be up and running before the next infrastructure initiat…

Unfortunately, I doubt Starlink will be generally available that close to Sydney CBD. The population density would be too high.

Maybe Sydney’s rural fringe? (Dural? Glenorie? Maroota? Wiseman’s Ferry? Camden? Rural parts of Central Coast like Holgate, Lisarow, Somersby?)

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#528
post #370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Has anyone come out with a reason for the size? I mean they seem to reuse a lot of the same textures throughout the game so I have a hard time understanding how it managed to swell to that.

The amount of uncompressed audio in todays games is too damn high.

[deleted]

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#529
post #422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can think of two reasons which are purely non-techincal: - The bigger the game, the less space for other games. - Much like adding metal to the inside consumer headphone purely to weight it down and give a premium feeling (they do this with other products as well). A larger program may be perceived as more significant.

That backfired, I chose my last premium headset over the other because it was lighter. Who wants a rock attached to their ears? In their carry on?

People who buy Beats headphones.

Re: Beta users of Starlink get downloads of 11 to 60 Mbps

#530

Can anyone tell me why this was not previously possible? Both latency and speed? What did Starlink do differently

It is possible and has been done before in the past. The companies that tried it went bankrupt because the business plan doesn't work out. The ground stations are too expensive for end consumers. Starlink will likely see the same fate unless they get government money.

That's not necessarily true. SpaceX has a massive advantage that previous companies didn't – launch costs.

SpaceX is getting all of these satellites up for an insanely low cost.

Post reply on HN