Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's also not even wrong. You can't see why? Let's say we're imagining what Uranus would look like. I draw a picture, and say it should look like a "fuzzy Jupter." But you ask, why should it look that way? Do you have a reason? And I say you should be confident, but don't provide an argument. By the end, I start talking about how it might look like Saturn. Then I come along and say, "it should be obvious the fuzzin…
He isn't explaining why the blackhole would look like a fuzzy coffee mug stain. He's explaining why the _picture_ of the blackhole will look like a fuzzy coffee mug stain. To your point, it's like taking a picture of Uranus with film and waiting for it to develop. People familiar with the matter can guess what the _image_ will look like not what Uranus actually looks like. This is all very clear in the first 25 secon…
Unless I'm misunderstanding your intentions and you just meant that as a condescending insult?