I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

Do you believe there's a fundamental tradeoff between structural constraints (i.e. the 'democratic' model, where dispersed shareholders and markets have a voice) vs. insulated leadership (i.e. the 'benevolent dictator' model, where competent leaders are shielded from short-term shareholder pressure)?

Also, thank you for your quick replies.

Somewhat related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benevolent_dictatorship

I happen to think a lot about this exact case. Walt Disney was an innovater who hated to repeat himself. He took enormous leaps of faith multiple times during his career in doing something completely new/different. Snow White: first full length feature film, Disneyland, and then EPCOT. He also hated making sequels on animated movies, he thought of it as a cash grab. That's why sequels like Bambi 2 and Cinderella 2 came decades after his death.

The reason I believe for all this is that founders like this are visionaries that are hard to corrupt. Walt had a strange relationship with money, he didn't long to have a lot of it, yet he knew he needed it to build his extraordinary projects. Ofcourse a founder with no care for money is a recipe for disaster, thus his brother Roy, an accountant often critizing Walt's ideas made the perfect match for the powerful duo that they were.

When Walt died, his vision died with him. The company slowly got handed over to other CEOs like Eisner and Iger. They just see the world very different, they just needed to secure the future of the company and make as much money as possible, sequels started to come out, park prices drastically went up while reinnovation stayed far behind.

We all know that the innovative soul of Disney died with him and that's very sad. But on the bright side, his story can still inspire others to make their magic.

My question to @eries; I studied business in the university of Rotterdam before coming a developer. Our bachelor was a 4 year course with your 'Lean startup method' at it's core. One thing that bothers me a lot in this day and age is the culture of reiterating and 'ship fast'. I look up a lot to Walt and his vision was quite the opposite. He built stuff and had a special eye for quality before releasing anything. He had the nerve to remove parts of a movie where artists had worked 8 months for the sake of the quality of a piece. I feel we live in an age with no sense for quality anymore. We just are to re-iterate as fast as possible and build shitty MVPs to see if there is demand. I get the idea, really.

But honestly, as an industry, at the same the bar for quality is extremely low. And it's in the entire industry from startups to SME to Enterprises. With AI, this trend only seems to become worse, we generate more, but not necessarily better. We are going to be in a time where signal to noise ratio will be incredibly low, and the demand for quality products is going to be up.

I hope it doesn't sound too bitter, but I just long for that old philosophy of quality first. Curious what you think about that!!

Downvotes mean nothing on HN, alas.

Factual statements are downvoted because some people don't like the facts quoted. And, worse, mods find that okay.

It makes HN a worse place for serious discussion and for finding out the facts about an issue, because what is discussed is driven by lazy, stupid people's sentiments.