Live data from Hacker News

GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

github.blog

511–520 of 583 posts

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#511
post #255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It has been years now of reading this same comment... Surely people can't keep typing it forever.

But the prices haven't been going up by multiples of 6 for the past few years. Things are actually changing now. I don't think it's over, but in the short term, it's going to be considerably more expensive.

And it didn't really get flawless, did it? All the same objections stand, but the cost is inevitably blowing up for the same kinda jank product.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#512
post #29

"Plan prices aren’t changing.” Isn't this like saying "The Porsche you rented at $200/mo is now a Honda. But the price hasn't changed!"

Having rented cars a lot, this is actually quite common.

What country, I haven't seen anything but unlimited miles for over a decade.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#513

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dunno, if in this day and age you are making inference more expensive, more scarce, you are honestly moving in the wrong direction and DeepSeek and others will gladly take your lunch.

The hardware to run deepseek is still incredibly expensive.

Have you seen the news about qwen3.6? People are running it on sub 1000 euro hardware. Apparently it's about as good as Claude sonnet.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#514

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huh, I find my copilot plugin to be so incredibly glitchy. My agents are always reporting that their shells are mangled that commands are truncated and all kinds of nonsense. Sometimes they spin up dev servers fine other times it just hangs waiting for a terminal response. So far I have found relying on the CLI from the model providers to be significantly more reliable. I do like the integrations with the IDE however…

I had this problem and it turns out it was my oh-my-posh command prompt customization. VS Code injects certain control characters into the output stream for agents to observe events and the theming runs after those mechanics are hooked up so it can interfere. Updating to the latest oh-my-posh fixed it for me. Here's the oh-my-posh GH issue[0] in case your problem is similar but not solvable with a simple package upda…

I have the same problem with zsh + powerlevel10k

but surely the issue is on VS Code side, to do things in a way that work with people's shells as they are

other agent harnesses don't have the same problems with my shell

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#515

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The hardware to run deepseek is still incredibly expensive. Deepseek API pricing is very low compared to Anthropic/OpenAI API pricing. For many, the 300% difference in pricing may be difficult to justify, if the quality difference is very small. And there will be many tasks where the most expensive/the best model, is not needed. Currently many people end up using Opus 4.7/GPT 5.5 for many tasks without thinking abo…

Is deepseek still on subsidized pricing though.

Near zero probability of that. The model is more efficient and the company who trained it did not blunder trillions of dollars to do so. China has better electricity infrastructure than the US too, so the likelihood they can scale out before the US ever could is high. Long term deepseek, Alibaba, etc hold the most cards for sustainable AI even despite the attempted Nvidia embargo

I am not shilling China, this is just what is happening right now.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#516
post #443

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use vscode with containers extensively. Not sure why containers imply CLI.

do you run vscode in the container ? if so, can you share your config ? i've been trying to do this with systemd-nspawn

Easiest way to do it would be enable ssh in container and then use VSCode ssh extension. Your host VSCode “becomes” your container VSCode.

I run it natively on my rocky8 container with UI sometimes but usually just do ssh

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#517

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huh, I find my copilot plugin to be so incredibly glitchy. My agents are always reporting that their shells are mangled that commands are truncated and all kinds of nonsense. Sometimes they spin up dev servers fine other times it just hangs waiting for a terminal response. So far I have found relying on the CLI from the model providers to be significantly more reliable. I do like the integrations with the IDE however…

I had this problem and it turns out it was my oh-my-posh command prompt customization. VS Code injects certain control characters into the output stream for agents to observe events and the theming runs after those mechanics are hooked up so it can interfere. Updating to the latest oh-my-posh fixed it for me. Here's the oh-my-posh GH issue[0] in case your problem is similar but not solvable with a simple package upda…

Ive also had huge problems with copilot and terminals, mostly due to corporate antivirus which makes it impossible to install clink for example. So the Shell integration never really worked. It has been fixed for a couple of months though now, and its working, maybe not great but at least very good.

The only sad thing is trying to use tools in a VS developer prompt (and how could this not have been fixed ages ago, its literall YOUR OWN flagship product). It knows how to launch the .cmd for it, but thats incredibly slow for single commands. Would be nice if I could tell it to just use an open terminal.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#518
post #247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bingo. I created a few autonomous skills that did exactly that for plan review, implementation, and branch review, review autonomously until green. I was using 100M+ tokens per day, $250 per day or so and only paying $160 per month to GitHub. I cancelled my GHCP sub and switched to Codex last week, so far so good but I miss Gemini 3.1 Pro for UI work.

And this, right here, is why none of us can have nice, cheap things.

It was going to happen regardless due to the nature of enshittification. If they really wanted to stop people using 100M tokens a day, they could've prevented it years ago.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#520
post #4

The era of subsidised inference is truly ending. The new model multipliers ( https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing... ) seem like a huge leap, though. From 1x to 6x for new-ish GPT and Sonnet models. 27x for Opus... Seems like folks would be better off with OpenRouter instead.

Wow, having a corp. account I do wonder WHEN we are getting some kind of resctriction of usage, or require us to justify our usage.

That GPT4-mini change is going to be brutal! Its much better than 5-mini, which was itself much better than earlier free models.

Post reply on HN