Live data from Hacker News

GPT-4.1 in the API

openai.com

511–513 of 513 posts

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#511
post #510
post #508

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the whole answer being correct that's the important thing, and if you compare GPT 3 vs where we are today only 5 years later the progress in accuracy, knowledge and intelligence is jaw dropping.

I have no idea what you're talking about because they still screw up in the exact same way as gpt3.

The hallucination quantity and severity is way less in new frontier models.

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#512
post #511
post #510

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have no idea what you're talking about because they still screw up in the exact same way as gpt3.

The hallucination quantity and severity is way less in new frontier models.

But not more predictable or regular.

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#513
post #502

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not. It's closed source. But Google is still the worst when it comes to privacy. I prefer to use only open source models that don't have the possibility to share my data with a third party.

The notion that Google is worse at carefully managing PII than a Wild West place like OpenAI (or Meta, or almost any major alternative) is…not an accurate characterization, in my experience. Ad tech companies (and AI companies) obsessively capture data, but Google internally has always been equally obsessive about isolating and protecting that data. Almost no one can touch it; access is highly restricted and carefull…

I'm not convinced Google is the gold standard for protecting PII. Data breaches can still happen despite internal controls, and their ad-based business model incentivizes data collection. The "high-level employees getting fired" story sounds like PR - how often does that actually happen? I'm not buying that they're leagues ahead of everyone else in data protection.
Post reply on HN