When you step back and look at the situation, it's not hard to see why Netflix dropped the ball here. Here's now I see it (not affiliated with Netflix, pure speculation): - Months ago, the "higher ups" at Netflix struck a deal to stream the fight on Netflix. The exec that signed the deal was probably over the moon because it would get Netflix into a brand new space and bring in large audience numbers. Along the way t…
Not sure why Netflix is held in high regard - this proves they're just as much clowns as the other 'big players' in the circus.
Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
511–520 of 986 posts
Re: Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
#512When you step back and look at the situation, it's not hard to see why Netflix dropped the ball here. Here's now I see it (not affiliated with Netflix, pure speculation): - Months ago, the "higher ups" at Netflix struck a deal to stream the fight on Netflix. The exec that signed the deal was probably over the moon because it would get Netflix into a brand new space and bring in large audience numbers. Along the way t…
Re: Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
#513Re: Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
#514In boxing you are old by 32 or maybe 35 year old for heavy weight, and everything goes down very very fast.
End of rant.
Re: Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
#515Earlier quoted context omitted.
that’s totally unacceptable for live sports which people are able to bet on
I have bad news for you. This is how it works already for “live” sports
Even the best latency is dozens of seconds behind live action.
Re: Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
#516When you step back and look at the situation, it's not hard to see why Netflix dropped the ball here. Here's now I see it (not affiliated with Netflix, pure speculation): - Months ago, the "higher ups" at Netflix struck a deal to stream the fight on Netflix. The exec that signed the deal was probably over the moon because it would get Netflix into a brand new space and bring in large audience numbers. Along the way t…
[flagged]
Re: Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
#517Why didn’t they use Netflix AI to solve the problems?
Re: Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
#518Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a ridiculous statement. PrimeVideo is the leader in terms of sports events streaming over internet and it is composed of hundreds of microservices. Live streaming is just much harder than streaming, and it takes a years of work and a huge headcount to get something good.
Prime famously undid some amount of their microservices recently because it couldn’t keep up, and was hideously expensive.
To be clear when I said that PrimeVideo is composed of hundreds of microservices, I actually meant that it's composed of hundreds of services, themselves composed, more often than not, of multiple microservices.
Depending on your definition of a microservice, my team alone owns dozens.
Re: Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
#519How is this story not on the front page anymore? 375 comments. Seems like a big story to me.
I believe HN's algorithm tends to relatively downrank stories with a high comment-to-upvote ratio, because they are more often flamewars on divisive topics.
If lots of people are upvoting and downvoting the same comments, that's treated as a signal the topic is contentious and people are likely to start behaving badly.
HN is very clear they prioritize good behavior as the long term goal, and they are as a result comfortable having contentious topics fall in the ranking even if everyone involved in the discussion feels the topic is important.
Re: Netflix buffering issues: Boxing fans complain about Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson
#520Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand why nobody here believes you. There's no reason to doubt what you say, probably people identify with the mistreated one. Why?
Because the idea that all the engineers that work at his large company are morons is absurd. Anyone in that situation that believes that and even more, states it, is just making their own character flaws apparent.
All the engineers in MY company are morons.
They're just bureucrats.