511–520 of 1001 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It could be, but it could also be because he is genuinely worried about the future impact of runaway capitalism without guardrails + AI.
Then the government should takeover OpenAI
Other sources mention more clearly that a proposal is made for an entity that would "provide (and revoke) licences to create AI". Can this be seen as curbing Open Source AI as a consequence?
Remember that popular recent post about OpenAI not having a moat? Well it looks like they are digging one, with a little help from the government.
What we expected License for me but not for thee Think of the children Building the moat
Sounds desperate now that open source models are quickly catching up without the woke mind virus.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds desperate now that open source models are quickly catching up without the woke mind virus.
Imagine calling empathy a virus.
Not the same thing. I would not go there: let us remain on the prospected regulation of technology, in this case, and reserve distinctions for other conversations. This initiative could have drastic consequences.
Open AI lobbying for regulation on common people being able to use AI, isn't it wonderful.
They acknowledged there’s no technical moat, so it’s time to lobby for a regulatory one. Predictable. Disappointing, but predictable.
We've seen this duck so many times before.
No need to innovate when you can regulate.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair LLMs are predicting the next token. It's just that to get better and better predictions it needs to understand some level of reasoning and math. However it feels to me that a lot of this reasoning is brute forced from the training data. Like chatgpt gets some things wrong when adding two very large numbers. If it really knew the algorithm for adding two numbers it shouldn't be making them in the first plac…
> If it really knew the algorithm for adding two numbers it shouldn't be making them in the first place. You're using it wrong. If you asked a human to do the same operation in under 2 seconds without paper, would the human be more accurate? On the other hand if you ask for a step by step execution, the LLM can solve it.