Live data from Hacker News

Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

nytimes.com

511–520 of 626 posts

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#511

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[edited for typos and grammer] Anecdotally, I've run a couple of tech conferences and know others who have as well fairly recently. We've made a point to hold workshops for under represented groups, had the Codes of Conduct, make a lot of extra effort to reach out to women as speakers etc.. In the end, we would get 5 to 10 times as many talk submissions from men, accept nearly all of the talks by women (often turning…

I’ll repeat points that aren’t my original ideas, but are painfully obvious here. It’s very simple what it’s become: sexist against men. This is what happens when you aim for equality of outcome instead of equality of opportunity. I believe we’re in a Kantian second stage. We were sexist against women. Now, we’re sexist against men. The hopeful third step

I'm genuinely curious how we might factor in the differences between genders in occupation selection and that women and men may innately value different types of work e.g. women are more empathic than men and dominate the nursing field etc

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#512

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Physics hardly any more applicable to software development than biology is, especially areas like biostats or neurophysiology that involve directly writing code. But these numbers sure suggest that something is wrong with computer science departments.

> sure suggest that something is wrong with computer science departments. Why? Why do men and women have to have the same preferences in what to study, in your opinion? Does the fact that 78% of students in veterinary science are female "sure suggest" that something is wrong with veterinary science? Since there are so many fields where women vastly outnumber men (and women significantly outnumber men overall in colle…

Which specific biological mechanism are you hypothesizing is responsible? In combination with which specific cultural construction of computer science that is somehow inalterable?

Whereas we have pretty good evidence that by improving the signaling of ambient belonging for women we can significantly increase their interest in computer science: http://ilabs.uw.edu/sites/default/files/Cheryan_Meltzoff_Kim...

Few things with a biological mechanism are that easy to manipulate.

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#513

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[edited for typos and grammer] Anecdotally, I've run a couple of tech conferences and know others who have as well fairly recently. We've made a point to hold workshops for under represented groups, had the Codes of Conduct, make a lot of extra effort to reach out to women as speakers etc.. In the end, we would get 5 to 10 times as many talk submissions from men, accept nearly all of the talks by women (often turning…

That's interesting. I have seen a number of female tech personalities being pretty critical of being asked to speak for free. I have never been paid by a conference I spoke at, speaking as a male. I never connected that maybe having that expectation of getting remuneration discourages people from speaking since most conferences probably don't. That said, I have come to see some pushes for diversity in tech as being e…

If conferences were built by men for men and are, in some inadvertent way, less rewarding for women to attend, it would make sense that women substitute monetary compensation for the non-monetary compensation they don't get.

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#514

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not? Just publish who makes how much money. That’s it.

>Why not? Just publish who makes how much money. That’s it. Okay. Let's make a thought experiment. Company A. Senior Java Developer. $100K. Company B. Senior Java Developer. $120K. Question: is the Java developer in Company A underpaid?

What’s the point of this thought experiment?

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#515
post #468

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think you're listening to the above poster very well; or giving them the benefit of the doubt. Boys are statistically over prescribed ADD medication in schools because, studies show, teachers are more likely to write them up for being a distraction to class. So, this thread says the daughter is being pushed to like math over animals, yet, you doubt that a son (there is no gender gap pre-high school in math, i…

You are correct, my comment assumes more of a gender bias discussion from the OP then their words deserve. You are wrong in that my assertion about parenting and that the parent is the best fit to make that call. Their claim of "If I was a parent of this child..." Is exactly the kind of stuff I'd spout before I had children. And in your comment you completely disregard this point I'm making. So in a way, you aren't l…

ADD is interesting and a clear example of bias, in that it is over-diagnosed and over-medicated in boys and under-diagnosed and under-medicated in girls. Simply saying it is "over prescribed" can make things worse for the people who are already being most neglected.

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#516

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m not talking about one-off meetings where the name doesn’t stick. That happens to everyone, of course. I’m talking about working on projects with the same group of people over a period of months. I have not seen the Matts and Ryans of the world have this problem.

I don't think there is anyway to know if that's because you're female or not. It could be personality, politics, among many different factors. I think it's unfair to assume that people don't remember your name because you're a female. I've worked with people for almost a year without remembering their name, because I'm awful with names. They were also very quiet and introverted, rarely said much and I suspect that ha…

Hey, so I'm sure you didn't mean it this way, but this comment sounds like gaslighting: a woman told you about her experience, and you immediately disbelieved her and told her she is not only incorrect about her experience but that it must be her fault for being "quiet and introverted"?

I recommend starting out by assuming she has knowledge and experiences you don't have access to and learning from it, rather than trying to explain away this new information.

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#517

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Men, especially clients, often forgot my name. E.g. Janice vs Janet vs Jan (none of these my real name, but you get the idea. The point is that I wasn't important enough to these men to remember.) Are you aware this kind of thing happens to everyone? Do you expect people to remember your name just because you're a woman? Or would you rather they remembered your name because you've accomplished something beyond the…

I’m not talking about one-off meetings where the name doesn’t stick. That happens to everyone, of course. I’m talking about working on projects with the same group of people over a period of months. I have not seen the Matts and Ryans of the world have this problem.

Correlation =/ causation

You could be experiencing this phenomenon for a handful of reasons, none of which being the reason you stated.

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#518

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, indeed they do. [1] Do any other companies? The original comment indicated that such policies were not common at software companies, but Amazon is obviously a software company... 1: https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/amazon-parenta...

That's the point — most don't, and most men don't seem to understand why it's a problem (your comment above is not atypical).

I'm not sure how this proves the point that the lack of such policies at tech companies discourages women from working there. Only one company has been mentioned as offering this policy, and it's a major tech company. Are there others? Are there fields where it is common?

I've never heard of it before now, and I worked for years as a corporate lawyer. And my lack of awareness isn't because I'm a man, as you've implied — my wife has also never heard of such a policy (and she works outside tech). Both of us have heavily researched the leave policies in our respective fields, as we have used them on multiple occasions.

If there are a bunch of non-tech companies offering this policy, then perhaps that could lead to your conclusion that it's one of the reasons women choose other fields. But based on what has been described so far, it's equally likely that this is an incredibly rare policy that does pull people into or push people from the tech sector. If there are sectors where this is common, please enlighten us!

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#519
HN is a very civilized place, and this thread is the closest I have ever seen to a toxic environment.

A lot of people (men) here complaining about women getting things too easy in tech. Talk to a woman in tech. Look around you and see how many women there are. Men are still running the show.

Re: Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

#520
post #285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not being down-voted because it's not a valid discussion point, but instead probably just because HN has a very liberal audience. Even the most educated are still capable of bias, and many here do not like the opinion that it is possible that women differ from men in any significant ways. Don't take the down-votes too personally. As long as you are posting constructive feedback with some evidence to your hypothe…

I don't take the downvotes personally (it's not my post, after all) but it makes me rather curious. I think it strange that a liberal audience would dispute the fact that there are differences between men and women, even significant differences.

Prepare for the hardest facepalm you've probably ever experienced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10fDRERJh4w
Post reply on HN