501–510 of 752 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kagi indirectly funds the Kremlin's regime, just to know where your money goes if we're talking about not supporting google.
Damn, how so?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you tried Kagi yet? It's pretty popular among HN folks, and I find it easily worth the price.
Kagi indirectly funds the Kremlin's regime, just to know where your money goes if we're talking about not supporting google.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you are saying a company should never reinvest profits in the company to support another money losing business until it’s profitable? Should Netflix for instance not invested money from renting DVDs to invest in a streaming service? Apple not use the profits it was making from selling Apple //e’s to create the Mac?
> So you are saying a company should never reinvest profits in the company to support another money losing business until it’s profitable? If it makes it impossible to set up a competitor? Absolutely, yes. > Should Netflix for instance not invested money from renting DVDs to invest in a streaming service? Netflix was not priced below the cost of production from the beginning. You're confusing sustainable pricing and…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you are saying a company should never reinvest profits in the company to support another money losing business until it’s profitable? Should Netflix for instance not invested money from renting DVDs to invest in a streaming service? Apple not use the profits it was making from selling Apple //e’s to create the Mac?
Subsidizing the cost of developing a product isn't necessarily bad, but predatory pricing that prohibits competition would be. Not sure that this case is either. This is just idiots breaking the TOS.