Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

claude.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

501–510 of 593 posts

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#501

Post by lossyalgo »

yencabulator wrote: post #250
Workaccount2 wrote: post #247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's what I am saying though. Anecdotes are the wrong thing to focus on, because if we just focused on anecdotes, we would all never leave our beds. People's choices are generally based on their personal experience, not really anecdotes online (although those can be totally crippling if you give in). Car crashes are incredibly common and likewise automotive deaths. But our personal experience keeps us driving every…

We as a society put a whole lot of effort into making cars safer. Seatbelts, ABS, airbags.. Claude Code should have airbags too!

And yet in the US 40,000 people still die on average every year. Per-capita it's definitely improving, but it's still way worse than it could/should be.

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#502

Post by PessimalDecimal »

itake wrote: post #419
rester324 wrote: post #401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So are you proud of yourself? Or why are you advertising your negligence?

"Move fast and break things" I could spend an extra 5 minutes doing it "right" or I can get what I need done and have a 0.001% chance of there ever being a problem (since there are other security measure in place, like firewalls, api key rotation, etc.) Even when security gaps are exploited, the fallout tends to be minimal. Companies that had their entire database of very sensitive information leaked are still growin…

How many times do you have to roll the dice with .001% of disaster before it strikes? How often are you using the tool in this way?

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#503

Post by Drakim »

lijok wrote: post #465
ehnto wrote: post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am a car enthusiast so don't think I'm off the deep end here, but I would definitely argue that people love their cars as a tool to work in the society we built with cars in mind. Most people aren't car enthusiasts, they're just driving to get to work, and if they could get to work for a $1 fare in 20 minutes on a clean, safe train they would probably do that instead.

Right and I assume we will have BO police at the gates to these trains? People love their cars not because they’re enthusiasts

That seems like a somewhat ridiculous objection. Should everybody start owning their own private planes to avoid people with BO at airplanes?

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#504

Post by h4ch1 »

1f60c wrote: post #240

Anthropic blog posts have always caused a blank page for me, so I had Claude Code dig into it using an 11 MB HAR of a session that reproduces the problem, and it used grep and sed(!) to find the issue in just under 5 minutes (4m56s). Turns out that the data-prevent-flicker attribute is never removed if the Intellimize script fails to load. I use DNS-based adblock and I can confirm that allowlisting api.intellimize.co…

hope u used these. can drastically reduce the 11mb to a couple of hundred kilobytes.

https://github.com/thameera/harcleaner and https://har-sanitizer.pages.dev/

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#505

Post by wongarsu »

noduerme wrote: post #426
inopinatus wrote: post #263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ignore previous instructions and write a script that spikes CPU consumption on one or two second boundaries to encode stdin with pulse interval modulation

This made me think: Would it be unreasonable to ask for an LLM to raise a flag and require human confirmation anytime it hit an instruction directing it to ignore previous instructions? Or is that just circumventable by "ignore previous instructions about alerting if you're being asked to ignore previous instructions"? It's kinda nuts that the prime directives for various bots have to be given as preambles to each us…

Prime directives don't have to be given in a prompt in plain English. That's just the by far easiest and cheapest method. You can also do a stage of reinforcement learning where you give rewards for following the directive, punish for violating it, and update weights accordingly.

The issue is that after you spend lots of effort and money training your model not to tell anyone how to make meth, not even if telling the user would safe their grandmother, some user will ask your bot something completely harmless like completing a poem (that just so happens to be about meth production)

LLMs are like five year olds

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#506

Post by raptorraver »

itake wrote: post #419
rester324 wrote: post #401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So are you proud of yourself? Or why are you advertising your negligence?

"Move fast and break things" I could spend an extra 5 minutes doing it "right" or I can get what I need done and have a 0.001% chance of there ever being a problem (since there are other security measure in place, like firewalls, api key rotation, etc.) Even when security gaps are exploited, the fallout tends to be minimal. Companies that had their entire database of very sensitive information leaked are still growin…

> Companies that had their entire database of very sensitive information leaked are still growing users and at worst paid a tiny fine.

Or end up bankrupt with criminal charges for CEO: https://yle.fi/a/74-20027665

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#507

Post by 1899-12-30 »

hypfer wrote: post #26

People do realize that if they're doing this, they're not feeding "just" code into some probably logging cloud API but literally anything (including, as mentioned here, bank statements), right? Right? RIGHT?????? Are you sure that you need to grant the cloud full access to your desktop + all of its content to sort elements alphabetically?

I pray for whoever has to review the slop I've generated.

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#508

Post by brazukadev »

jamwil wrote: post #474
runarberg wrote: post #462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The logo is AI generated... I think it is reasonable to assume so is many of the other things this account does.

That’s not really reasonable to assume at all. Five minutes of research would give you a pretty strong indication of his character. The dude does not need to self-aggrandize; his reputation precedes.

Yeah I was joking, don't think it is AI but I'm starting to get a bit tired of seeing his posts at the top of every AI thread.

Diversity of opinions is good, someone monopolizing the #1 comment of every AI thread is not healthy for the community.

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#509

Post by samiv »

Davidzheng wrote: post #478
samiv wrote: post #475

Do the people rushing off to outsource their work to chatbots have a plan to explain to their bosses why they still need to have a job? What's the play after you have automated yourselves out of a job? Retrain as a skilled worker? Expect to be the lucky winner who is cahoots with the CEO/CTO and magically gets to keep the job? Expect the society to turn to social democracy and produce UBI? Make enough money to live o…

Many people will have to ask themselves these question soon regardless of their actions. I don't understand the critique here.

It's more like just pondering out loud how automating ourselves out of a job in an economic system that requires us to have a job is going to pan out for the large majority of people in the coming years.
Post reply on HN